The Oxbridgers at The Economist excell at chronicling the deaths of its many enimies: Muammar Qaddafi, Saddam Hussein, Ali Khamenei!

Newspaper Readed: Let me focus on the final paragraphs of this obituary.

stephenkmacksd.com/

Mar 03, 2026

Editor: The reader might wonder at the fact that the Iranian Revovution was codified on February 1979 and it is March 3, 2026 : 43 years have elapsed: what might the reader think of the longevity of Iran, in historical terms? And that it is fighting a war against Israel and America, and doing so with dispatch!

The rulers’ resilience is not just due to ideology. The regime is more complex than other Middle Eastern dictatorships and has more organisational depth. And it was always going to be a tall order to topple the regime from the air. But the extent of the appeal to the Shia tradition of martyrdom could yet be a factor in determining how long and how desperately the Islamic Republic keeps fighting and how many casualties Iran’s forces can endure. Around 1,300 Iranian soldiers have been killed in the first three days of the bombardment, according to a field report from a Kurdish human-rights group with a presence on the ground. Iranian officials acknowledge that their arsenal is no match for American and Israeli armoury. But ideology, they argue, can sustain a prolonged and asymmetrical war of attrition, just as in the 1980s when for eight years it drove hundreds of thousands to their deaths on the battlefield against Iraq.

An internet blackout makes public opinion hard to gauge. The loathing for Khamenei has surely not dissipated but those who once chanted death to the dictator are now indoors, sheltering from American and Israeli bombardment. Fear that their cities could be reduced to rubble like those of Gaza may also have swayed some against supporting the attackers. It has also galvanised ideologues, including the 6m Iranians Mr Mamouri estimates followed Khamenei’s fatwas, or religious opinions. And it has given a new lease of life to the regime’s anti-American and anti-Zionist slogans, of which most Iranians had tired.

Beyond Iran’s borders, the imagery of martyrdom resonates, too. Millions of Shias worldwide recognised Khamenei’s spiritual authority. Clerics with followers across the Shia world have declared a jihad to avenge his killing. In Karachi, in southern Pakistan, protesters attempting to storm the American consulate were killed; in Baghdad, in Iraq, crowds tried to breach security cordons near the American embassy. Iran’s allies abroad may be stirring. The Houthis in Yemen, which previously lobbed missiles at Israeli and Saudi Arabia and severely disrupted shipping in the Red Sea, remain poised. Hizbullah has resumed limited missile fire at Israel. Iraqi militias have struck near Erbil, the Kurdish enclave in northern Iraq, where American forces are based. Fears that a triumphant region-wide Sunni coalition—backed by America, Turkey and Israel—might again threaten Shia communities are prompting preparations for a broader sectarian conflagration.

The restraints that Khamenei’s “strategic patience” put on his hardliners are also gone. Since his death, Iran has attacked its Gulf neighbours with hundreds of missiles and drones. Iran-watchers predict they will ditch his fatwa against nuclear weaponisation, and seek to produce inter-continental missiles he opposed. The balance of power in Tehran has shifted accordingly. Before his killing, pragmatists had topped Iran-watchers’ lists of Khamenei’s likely successors. Hassan Khomeini, the reformist grandson of the republic’s founder, and Hassan Rouhani, the former president who negotiated the nuclear deal with America and other global powers in 2015, were front-runners. Both favoured a rapprochement with the West.

Instead, Alireza Arafi, the cleric elevated to the three-man committee that took power on Khamenei’s death, is an ideological hardliner. He was the head of al-Mustafa, the seminary in Qom that trains foreign students to export Iran’s revolution. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the regime’s praetorian guard, has also tightened its grip. It has replaced Iran’s border guards with its own forces in vulnerable provinces such as Kurdistan, and replaced its assassinated chief with Ahmad Vahidi, the first commander of the IRGC’s foreign arm, the Quds Force. He is accused of building up Hizbullah and orchestrating attacks against Jewish targets abroad. “He’s a very bad person, even worse than the one who was assassinated,” says Sima Shine, a former Mossad operative and Iran watcher.

Editor: This paragraph can be called by its actual name: ‘Wishful Thinking’ or better yet mendacity!

It is possible that, once the guns fall silent, Iran’s many resolutely secular-minded people will again assert themselves. A post-Khamenei—or even post-regime—Iran might yet seek reconciliation with the West. A pragmatic commander could emerge, intent on a smooth transition to salvage what remains of the republic’s considerable assets at home and in the Gulf principalities it has been bombing. Ethnic insurgencies on the periphery might fracture a defeated state. For now the war has postponed such reckonings. But by dying what his followers hail as a martyr’s death Khamenei may have prolonged the life of the system he built, even if he cannot save it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The NYT Times today!

stephenkmacksd.com/

Mar 03, 2026

Stocks Fall and Oil Prices Surge on Warning of Extended War

LIVE

March 3, 2026, 12:27 p.m. ET5m ago

U.S. Closes 2 Gulf Embassies; Israel Seizes Sites in Lebanon

Doug Mills/The New York Times

Analysis

Iran’s Strategy: Expand the War, Increase the Cost, Outlast Trump

Iran is aiming to draw out the conflict and broaden the fighting. That would force President Trump to risk more casualties and more political capital.

The Mood in Iran’s Capital: ‘Pray We Make It Through’

4 min read

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Reader consider Tom Friedman & Bret Stevens as Zionist Twins!

stephenkmacksd.com/

Mar 02, 2026


Tom Friedman is the Political Twin of Bret Stephens!

To think clearly about Middle East wars, you need to hold multiple thoughts in your head at the same time. It’s a complicated, kaleidoscopic region where religion, oil, tribal politics and great power politics interweave in every major story. If you are looking for a black-and-white narrative, you might want to take up checkers. So, here are my four thoughts on Iran — at least for today.

First, I hope this effort to topple the clerical regime in Tehran succeeds. It is a regime that murders its people, destabilizes its neighbors and has destroyed a great civilization. There is no single event that would do more to put the whole Middle East on a more decent, inclusive trajectory than the replacement of Tehran’s Islamic regime with a leadership focused exclusively on enabling the people of Iran to realize their full potential with a real voice in their own future.

To think clearly about Middle East wars, you need to hold multiple thoughts in your head at the same time. It’s a complicated, kaleidoscopic region where religion, oil, tribal politics and great power politics interweave in every major story. If you are looking for a black-and-white narrative, you might want to take up checkers. So, here are my four thoughts on Iran — at least for today.

Second, this will not be easy, because this regime is deeply entrenched and is hardly going to be toppled from the air alone.

Third, we must remember that the timing of the end of this war will be determined as much by the oil markets and the financial markets as by the military state of play inside Iran.

Fourth, we must not let this war to bring democracy and the rule of law to Iran distract us from the threats to democracy and the rule of law posed by Trump in America and by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel.

Editor: Reader there are only 1795 words left in Tom Friedman’s political chatter at full gallop. Yet Friedmans final paragraphs, awash in well worn platitudes resembles Miss Havisham’s wedding cake, well past rot!

It is way too early to predict how this war will impact two critical 2026 elections — one in Israel and one in the United States.

For Trump it is simple. He does not want to see the word “quagmire” in any headline with his name in it ahead of the midterms in November. As for Netanyahu, I could imagine him calling for early elections to use the downfall of the Iranian regime to keep himself in power. But victory over Iran could also complicate his politics. Netanyahu has notched short-term military defeats over Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah and Iran, but he has not translated a single one of them into long-term diplomatic or political gains. To do so would require him to agree to negotiate again with the Palestinians based on a framework of two states for two peoples.

The opportunity for Israel could be enormous: If the Islamic Republic of Iran is either toppled or defanged, I have little doubt that Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Syria, Oman, Qatar, Kuwait and maybe even Iraq would feel much more comfortable normalizing relations with Israel — on the condition that Netanyahu does not annex Gaza or the West Bank, but agrees instead to a plan for separation and a two-state solution. Would Netanyahu rise to that opportunity? Would Israeli voters punish him if he doesn’t?

But I get ahead of myself. I expect by Wednesday there will be at least three more points competing in my head to make sense of it all, because this is the most plastic, unpredictable moment in the Middle East since the Iranian Revolution in 1979. Everything — and its opposite — is possible.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The reader of Bret Stephens latest war mongering confronts, the fact that Leo Strauss invented the History, on which he and his epigones reley.

Newspaper Reader excumes the remaines of the Strausian Political Mythology, via Stephens toxic political refraction.

stephenkmacksd.com/

Mar 01, 2026

Headline: Trump and Netanyahu Are Doing the Free World a Favor

Editor: Stephens applys both soothing and reviling tones to his critics

President Trump is being criticized from many quarters for his decision to join Israel in a war to topple the Iranian regime, which on Saturday yielded the killing of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The reasons vary.

It’s “a betrayal of the American people,” says Elizabeth Warren, who warns that the intervention risks dragging “yet another generation into a forever war.” It’s a betrayal of MAGA principles, says Marjorie Taylor Greene, who denounced Trump for putting “America last.” It’s unconstitutional, according to the American Civil Liberties Unionbecause it’s being conducted without authorization from Congress. It’s unnecessary, according to the writer Andrew Sullivan, who (quoting me, albeit misleadingly) thinks that Iran isn’t much of a threat and the war is being waged for Israel’s sake.

Editor: notice that Stephens becomes the victim of these toxic actors, its victimology is varian tones!

And so on. But one country where the United States and Israel are garnering broad support is the same country that’s being bombed.

Editor: What might a reader, listener, viewer make of the two reports not from Zionist Front Man Bret Stephens?

Dr Mohammad Marandi LIVE From Iran + Military Analyst Haim Bresheeth Zabner:


Iran’s Missiles SMASH US Bases, Trump-Israeli War BACKFIRES | Elijah Magnier & Mohammad Marandi


Editor: The next 696 words of Stephens self-serving political chatter, makes way for self-adutatory chatter, featuring himself as thinket, writer, expert, not to speak of his singular attachment to the Genocidal State of Israel!

The United States is stronger when anti-American dictators have solid reasons to fear our wrath: It restores deterrence and, in doing so, makes diplomacy more effective. Israel and the Arab world are safer when Iran is weaker: Notice that, at least so far, Hezbollah, fearing for its position in Lebanon, has not joined the war against Israel. Finally, even if the regime doesn’t fall, it will be under heavy internal pressure to modify its behavior as a pragmatic concession to reality, much as Venezuela has under Delcy Rodríguez, its (hopefully) interim president.

That may not be the optimal outcome. But it’s considerably better than what came before.

Finally, the United States and Israel have taken considerable military and political risks to do the right thing. And that’s no small thing.

They have rid the world of an odious tyrant, and of several layers of his equally odious deputies. It’s odd that the same people who fault Trump for divorcing U.S. foreign policy from its democratic values now fault him for going to war for the sake of advancing democratic values. Still, millions of ordinary people around the world — not just in Tel Aviv or Tehran or Tehrangeles but also, perhaps, in Taipei and Tallinn — will notice that the United States, for its many warts, still stands for freedom.

My column has never been shy about denouncing either Trump or Netanyahu. It won’t be shy to criticize them in the future. But on Saturday this much-maligned duo did the free world a courageous and historic favor. It will be remembered long after the petulant criticism dies down.

Newspaper Reader.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Editor: On the proposition that there can never be enough high-brow Niall Ferguson?

Old Socialist on Ferguson and South Park!

stephenkmacksd.com/

Mar 01, 2026

Editor: Mr. Fergusons latest fore into Pop Culture: compare and contrast with this collection of Fergusons commetaries that follow this The Free Press chatter! ‘South Park’ is the measure of an utterly re-imagined Ferguson? A collection of those highbrow commetaries will follow!


On the Inconvience Of History: the case of Niall Ferguson from May 08, 2013!

Posted on March 18, 2025 by stephenkmacksd

Newspaper Reader: A case of bad judgement or someting else? stephenkmacksd.com/ Mar 16, 2025 The historian Niall Ferguson has denied being an “gay-basher”, claiming that his friendship with the prominent homosexual blogger Andrew Sullivan showed that he could not be … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment | Edit


Niall Ferguson opines: ‘Biden Can’t Pay His Way Out of Fighting Cold War II’

Posted on May 22, 2024 by stephenkmacksd

Political Observer comments. The regular reader of Mr. Niall Ferguson’s cumbersome , bloated historical panoramas, the word count in this instance is 2596 -The Straussian method is to drown the reader in verbiage, ideas, actors, as a strategy to make … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment | Edit


Katy Balls interviews Niall Ferguson & Freddy Gray: They discuss the Trump Conundrum, on YouTube of May 11, 2023

Posted on June 16, 2023 by stephenkmacksd

Political Observer comments. This discussion begins at the 01:20 point and ends before the 21:18 point. Katy Balls asks questions of her two guests Ferguson and Grey act the parts of Political Technocrats, relying on ‘Polling Data’ as a reliable source- … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment | Edit


Niall Ferguson in three keys. Political Skeptic reads the irrepressible ‘expert’ !

Posted on May 11, 2021 by stephenkmacksd

In the May 7, 2021 edition of the the TLS, Charles King’s reviews Niall Ferguson’s new book ‘Doom: The politics of catastrophe’. Some revelatory excerpts: … At its best, Doom is a vade mecum to misery. Whatever readers are facing … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment | Edit


The American Election 2020, as refracted through the Financial Times Editorial Board, Edward Luce & an assist from Niall Ferguson . Political Observer comments

Posted on November 4, 2020 by stephenkmacksd

I woke up at 4:30 AM PST, this morning, and checked twitter for the latest Election News, not knowing what to expect, other than bad news. Now at the breakfast table, I’ve read first the Editorial Board of The Financial … Continue reading →


Neo-Con Niall Ferguson on the Crisis in California: Fires, One Party Rule, ‘Decadence/Decline’. Political Skeptic comments

Posted on September 22, 2020 by stephenkmacksd

The reader can only wonder at Mr. Ferguson’s – what reads like nostalgia for George Deukmejian and Pete Wilson, of Prop 87? Oh! sorry he is just a late arrival to California, 2016, in its advanced state of ‘Decadence/Decay’ the … Continue reading →


Niall Ferguson on The Pandemic & other pressing questions. Political Observer comments

Posted on June 22, 2020 by stephenkmacksd

I came here from The Financial Times. Just looking at Gideon Rachman’s latest essay, made me a bit queasy: Headline: India picks a side in the new cold war Sub-headline: It is folly for China to drive its rival into … Continue reading →


Niall Ferguson takes the measure of the collapsing American Neo-Liberal State. Political Observer comments

Posted on June 8, 2020 by stephenkmacksd

Perhaps this is one of the reasons that Mr. Ferguson left the august Times ? ‘He is the founder and managing director of Greenmantle LLC, a New York-based advisory firm.’ Mr. Ferguson is another peddler, with his vaunted ‘expertise’ like … Continue reading →


Niall Ferguson & Gideon Rachman on ‘Sleepy Joe’. Political Observer comments

Posted on March 9, 2020 by stephenkmacksd

In his column of Sunday March 8, 2020, Niall Ferguson: Headline: Sleepy Joe Biden has given Donald Trump a wake-up call Sub-headline: Despite his senior moments, the comeback codger has a real shot I know Joe Biden. Not well, but … Continue reading →


Niall Ferguson & Edward Luce on Michael Bloomberg. Old Socialist comments

Posted on February 24, 2020 by stephenkmacksd

Compare Mr. Luce’s ‘political wisdom’, or should it be properly named a collection of reportorial, rhetorical cliches, a product of lazy thinking, that could have been written in haste? to that of Niall Ferguson’s essay of Sunday 23, 2020: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/past-six-days/2020-02-23/comment/michael-bloomberg-leads-in-cash-but-trails-in-charisma-hvjd33zxm … Continue reading →

Old Socialist.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bret Stephens and The New York Times are the the advocate/apologists for Trump & Miriam Adelson’s War on Iran!

Newspaper Reader.

stephenkmacksd.com/

Mar 01, 2026

Editor: A selection from Bret Stephens toxic commentary:

It’s a bad theory. To listen to the regime’s rhetoric is to be reminded of the Black Knight of “Monty Python and the Holy Grail,” who loses limb after limb while insisting he’s still winning. The regime has lost much of its nuclear infrastructure; watched its regional proxies be overthrowndecimated and incapacitated; presided over the implosion of its economy; and lost whatever domestic and international legitimacy remained to it.

No wonder protests in Iran have resumed, this time among university students who are bravely undaunted by the terrifying risk. Their protests seem connected to the 40-day memorials for the victims of last month’s massacres. But it’s not a stretch to assume those protests are also a signal to Trump that his promise last month to Iranians that “help is on its way” hasn’t been forgotten, and that ordinary Iranians are prepared to join the fight for their own liberation.

If so, then there is at least a reasonable chance that a sustained military operation that not only further degrades the regime’s nuclear, missile and military capabilities — a desirable outcome in its own right — but also targets its apparatus of domestic repression could embolden the type of sustained mass protests that could finally bring the regime down. Even more so if the leaders who give the orders, including the supreme leader and his circle, are not immune from attack.

For all of its willfulness and the evil it has wreaked over 47 years, the regime does not stand 10 feet tall. It nearly fell during the 2009 Green Movement against that year’s fraudulent elections. It nearly fell again in 2022 during the Women, Life, Freedom protests.

The difference on those occasions was the absence of external military support. Donald Trump now has a unique opportunity to provide it. Despite the risk that military strikes entail, the bigger risk, in the judgment of history, would be to fail to take it.

Editor: Bret Stephens is a Zionist Loyalist, his time from 2002 to 2004, as editor-in-chief of The Jerusalem Post demostrates his political loyelties? Or can that be construed as an instance of ‘Anti-Semitism’ the fallback position of a political opportunist ? Yet with no experience of war, but an utter penchent for sending others to fight his chosen battles: The Neo-Consevative calling card is strewn with the blood of others!


The New Your Times of March 1, 2026, 6:00 a.m. ET:

A Tyrant Falls. Dangerous Uncertainty Begins.

Editor : The New York Times like it’s hireling Stephens relpay the Old Cold War platitudes that are replayed again and again: Vietnam, The Iraq War, The War in Afghanistan.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei governed Iran with the vigilance and brutality of an autocrat convinced that his own people and the world’s superpower sought to unseat him — and in the end, they did. With President Trump’s announcement that Ayatollah Khamenei, the 86-year-old supreme leader, was killed in joint American and Israeli airstrikes on Saturday, his reign has come to a close, cementing a lost half-century for his nation. As the Middle East confronts an unpredictable void, let us be clear: No one should mourn the death of a dictator who spent decades inflicting misery and bloodshed.

Ascending to power in 1989, Ayatollah Khamenei organized his existence around an obsession with the West. As a ruler, he squelched dissent, labeling demands for reforms as Western “sedition,” and expanded the intelligence apparatus of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps to repress his own people. He impoverished his citizens to bankroll foreign interventions and a nuclear program that brought Iran only isolation. When faced with citizens’ protests, he answered with force, including the slaughter of thousands earlier this year. Abroad, his legacy is one of destabilization, having constructed a so-called axis of resistance across Gaza, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen.

Editor: The first paragraps of the NYT Opinion The Editorial Board

Editor: The final paragraps of this ‘Editorial’ again repeats the perenial tropes of American Hegemony/Imperiaism!

The president still has not offered an explanation for why this campaign will end any better than the 21st-century regime change efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan did. Those wars also toppled governments. Yet their disappointing, bloody legacies left Americans understandably skeptical of open-ended military operations.

Amid the chaos this strike will cause in Iran, Americans should brace for the possibility of retaliation. True, Iran has failed to exact almost any meaningful damage on the United States in recent years, and its military has been degraded. But it maintains an arsenal of missiles capable of overwhelming defense systems, and this weekend it hit a U.S. Navy base in Bahrain, among other targets in the region. Iran may also be capable of launching cyberattacks and proxy strikes against American forces and allies.

The bigger risks may lie in the future. The president of the United States has just helped assassinate a foreign leader without the approval of Congress, the support of most allies or a plan for the future. History suggests that unilateral American involvement along these lines often has consequences that are not immediately apparent. When American officials helped orchestrate the 1953 coup, they surely did not imagine that they were planting the seeds for the Middle East’s most radical anti-American government.

Managing the future in Iran will require thoughtfulness, attention and international cooperation. We urge Mr. Trump to work with Congress, but at this point we have little expectation that he will. Given this reality, Congress should play a leadership role; lawmakers from both parties are right to demand briefings and force a debate on war powers to ensure the president is constrained and held accountable.

Finally, the United States cannot navigate the uncertainty alone. The Trump administration, which has frequently treated our allies with scorn, should bring international partners into the fold, too. Confronting a post-Khamenei Iran requires strategic clarity and a global coalition, not isolated decision-making.

For decades, the Iranian people have sacrificed greatly for the prospect of a more open society. After enduring years of autocracy and international isolation, they deserve the opportunity to chart a freer, more stable future.

Editor: The reader must wonder at the inabilitiy of the these self-presented ‘experts’ who across time have caused more human suffering : Vietnam, The Iraq War, The War in Afghanistan. Yet wisdom wedded to self-congatulation is the vocabulary of political bankruptcy!

Newspaper Reader.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Financial Times of 2/28/2026 reports on the beginning of WWIII?

Newspaper Reader.

stephenkmacksd.com/

Feb 28, 2026

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Trump, The New Democrats & Schumer the ‘Shomer’!

Angry Old Socialist!

stephenkmacksd.com/

Feb 28, 2026

Does Emma Lazarus’ voice mean anything if the Age of Trump? The New Democrats mendacity and self-concratulation led by Schumer the ‘Shomer’ !

My last name is Schumer, which derives from the Hebrew word Shomer, or “guardian.” Of course, my first responsibility is to America and to New York. But as the first Jewish Majority Leader of the United States Senate, and the highest-ranking Jewish elected official in America ever, I also feel very keenly my responsibility as a Shomer Yisroel — a guardian of the People of Israel.

Angry Old Socialist!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Federal judges warn of contempt: The Marshall Project

stephenkmacksd.com/

Feb 27, 2026

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hillary Clinton accuses Republicans of ‘fishing expedition’ in Epstein testimony. Clinton delivers withering rebuke and says hearing is an attempt to deflect attention from Trump’s actions.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/26/clintons-testify-epstein-files-house

stephenkmacksd.com/

Feb 26, 2026

Hillary Clinton accuses Republicans of ‘fishing expedition’ in Epstein testimony

Clinton delivers withering rebuke and says hearing is an attempt to deflect attention from Trump’s actions

Hillary Clinton delivered a withering rebuke to a congressional committee investigating her supposed links to Jeffrey Epstein on Thursday, accusing its Republican members of embarking on a “fishing expedition” intended to cover up and deflect attention from the actions of Donald Trump.

In a furious opening statement, the former secretary of state suggested the event was “partisan political theatre” and “an insult to the American people” while repeating her insistence that she had never met Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex trafficker who died in 2019.

“You have compelled me to testify, fully aware that I have no knowledge that would assist your investigation, in order to distract attention from President Trump’s actions and to cover them up despite legitimate calls for answers,” she said, according to remarks she shared during the closed-door testimony.

Clinton’s onslaught came on the first day of a session that will also include a deposition on Friday by her husband, Bill Clinton, the former US president. The hearing is being staged at an arts center near the couple’s home in Chappaqua in upstate New York.

The Clintons reluctantly agreed to appear in response to a subpoena from the committee’s Republican chair, James Comer, after being threatened with contempt of Congress charges.

In her opening statement, Clinton excoriated the proceedings as “designed to protect one political party and one public official, rather than to seek truth and justice for the victims and survivors”.

Referencing her own career campaigning against sex trafficking, she added: “If this committee is serious about learning the truth about Epstein’s trafficking crimes, it would not rely on press gaggles to get answers from our current president on his involvement; it would ask him directly under oath about the tens of thousands of times he shows up in the Epstein files.

“If the majority was serious, it would not waste time on fishing expeditions. There is too much that needs to be done. What is being held back? Who is being protected? And why the cover-up?”

The hearing was temporarily suspended at the request of Clinton’s legal team after a photo of her giving testimony was shared on social media. It was later reported that the picture, posted by the Maga influencer Benny Johnson, had been taken by Lauren Boebert, one of the committee’s Republican members. It is against the rules for witnesses or lawmakers to take pictures during closed-door congressional hearings. Democrats condemned the breach as “unacceptable”.

Clinton resumed her testimony to the House of Representatives’ oversight committee shortly afterwards.

Robert Garcia, the committee’s ranking Democrat, said that during the interruption, Clinton had called for the hearing to be opened to the media.

The Clintons have previously complained they are being singled out unfairly to distract public attention from Trump, who had a long friendship with Epstein before breaking with him. They wanted the testimony to be given in public, rather than released in later in video and accompanying transcripts, as is planned.

Speaking during an afternoon break in proceedings, Garcia said Hillary Clinton had answered every question and called for transcripts of her deposition to be released within 24 hours. “The American people have a right to know exactly what she said, what questions were asked of her and how she responded,” he said.

Bill Clinton is scheduled to give testimony under identical circumstances on Friday, as representatives investigate links with Epstein that he has acknowledged and which are confirmed in files released by the justice department under congressional mandate.

Committee members have travelled to Chappaqua for the proceedings after it was agreed that the Clintons would not have to testify on Capitol Hill. Written transcripts and video footage from the depositions are expected to be released in the coming days.

Addressing journalists outside the Chappaqua Performing Arts Center, where the Clinton hearings are being staged, Republicans and Democrats vied for control of the narrative surrounding the files.

Comer, the committee chair, accused the Clintons of trying to avoid a subpoena when other public figures – including Bill Barr and Alex Acosta, members of the first Trump administration – had responded willingly.

“The Clintons haven’t answered very many, if any, questions about their knowledge or involvement with Epstein and [Ghislaine] Maxwell,” Comer said. “Again, no one is accusing at this moment the Clintons of any wrongdoing. They’re going to have due process. But we have a lot of questions, and the purpose of the whole investigation is to try to understand many things about Epstein.”

Garcia told reporters that he supported Bill Clinton being asked to address the committee but said Democrats would now demand that Trump testify following disclosures that files relating to a woman alleging he had sexually assaulted her when she was a minor had been excluded from the documents released.

He said: “Let’s get President Trump in front of our committee to answer the questions that are being asked across this country, from survivors, from those have been brutally attacked and raped, sometimes as children.”

Hillary Clinton’s summons has prompted accusations that the depositions are a partisan exercise intended to deflect scrutiny of Trump’s long association with Epstein.

James Walkinshaw, a Virginia Democrat on the committee, said: “There is no indication – zero, zip, zilch, nada – that Secretary Clinton had any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes. My fear is we’re here today as part of a political exercise, part of a long running fever dream where Republicans want to lock up Secretary Clinton.”

Hillary Clinton has denied having met Epstein, although she has acknowledged meeting Maxwell several times.

Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime confidant of the Clintons and Guardian columnist, said: “The big tell in the partisan intent behind this event is that they have subpoenaed and threatened with criminal contempt Hillary Clinton, who has nothing to offer, who has never met Jeffrey Epstein or communicated with him.

“She knows absolutely nothing. So the fact that you would do that to her and bind her into this shows exactly what their motive is.”

Both Clintons have deep experience in facing Republican-led inquisitions and have often emerged in politically stronger positions.

Hillary Clinton testified for nine hours in 2015 to a House select committee investigating a deadly terrorist attack on a US diplomatic mission in Libya that killed the US ambassador and three other Americans while she was secretary of state. Her appearance was widely deemed to have neutralized Republican attacks and boosted her campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Blumenthal, who also testified under subpoena to the 2015 panel, predicted that she would emerge unscathed from the latest hearings.

“Hillary faced Trey Gowdy [a former Republican representative and the select committee chair] who, at the end of the day, looked ridiculous,” he said. “Trey Gowdy is an intellectual giant compared to James Comer.”

Bill Clinton provided two sworn testimonies in 1998 resulting from a Republican-driven independent counsel investigation.

One related to sexual harassment allegations brought by Paula Jones, a former Arkansas state employee. He also gave grand jury testimony over allegations that his testimony in the previous hearing about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, a White House intern, amounted to perjury and obstruction of justice.

Bill Clinton has denied any wrongdoing and has called for all files relating to Epstein to be released. About 3m documents are believed to be still in the justice department’s possession, in violation of the terms of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Clinton acknowledges flying four times on Epstein’s private plan, nicknamed “the Lolita Express”, and appears in several photographs in the files, including one showing him and Epstein in a hot tub with a woman whose identity is redacted.

He says he cuts ties with Epstein in 2006 as the financier’s sexual crimes became known.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/26/clintons-testify-epstein-files-house

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment