Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
Categories
Meta
Author Archives: stephenkmacksd
Adrian Wooldridge , writing as ‘Bagehot’, on ‘Prince Philip and the dynasty factor’. Almost Marx comments.
The first paragraph reads like a weak but modulated defense of the Royals, in a History Made To Measure of their victimhood, at the hands of democratising forces: malign political actors, catastrophic events, all cobbled together to impress the reader … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Jordan Peterson and Warren Farrell on The Boy Crisis and Gender Politics. Queer Atheist comments.
The viewer/reader is confronted with Catch Phrases masquerading as descriptive of Thought. E.g., ‘The Closing of the American Mind’, ‘The Clash of Civilizations’ , ‘The End of History and the Last Man’, ‘Tenured Radicals’, ‘Illiberal Education’ , ‘The Right Nation’, … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
janan.ganesh@ft.com, not one day later ? Political Skeptic comments.
In his his essay of April 13, 2021, Mr. Ganesh proclaimes ‘A raucously free society is hard to mobilise against a rival in a lasting way’ ! He riffs on ‘rugged individualism’ ,in his surprising lack of mastery of American … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
janan.ganesh@ft.com on the impossibility of a ‘New Cold War’. Political Skeptic comments.
Even framed by Mr. Ganesh’s potted history of America’s Old Cold War, and the mention of Kennan, but not his ‘The Long Telegram’ nor his ‘Mr. X article’, this reader finds his whole article lacks anything like a viable case … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
gideon.rachman@ft.com on the EU’s stability. Political Skeptic comments.
The E.U.’s stability is built on adherence to its laws ? ******************************* Opinion: How France gets away with breaking EU rules on its … http://www.marketwatch.com › story › how-france-gets-away Oct 25, 2019 · France is already overshooting the treaty limit in 2019. … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
janan.ganesh@ft.com & edward.luce@ft.com on Joe Biden’s almost political revolution? Political Cynic comments
The regular reader of The Financial Times might look at the April 6, 2021 essay of Janan Ganesh: Headline: Biden shows that only moderates can govern from the left Sub-headline: The US president’s reassuring blandness frees him to do big … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Watching Dan Crenshaw on Joe Rogan: Queer Atheist comments.
Mr. Crenshaw manages the shot-gun wedding of the year: the Neo-Liberal Trinity of Hayek/Mises/Friedman to the self-hating, hysterical American Divine Johnathan Edwards’ ‘Sinner in the Hands of an Angry God’! Neo-Liberalism marries Christianity with Mr. Crenshaw officiating. The Estate of … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Macron v Le Pen as reported in The Financial Times. Political Skeptic comments .
Macron’s signature ‘Jupertarian Politics’ is the deadest of dead letters! He (M. 37%) has stumbled over his own egoism, and his toxic ambition to lead the foundering EU, Neo-Liberalism’s in all its ghostly apparitions, has stalled in answer to The … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Joe Biden as ‘constructed’ by Janan Ganesh. Political Cynic comments.
Mr. Ganesh employs his talent for aphorism, here, for a remarkable assertion, wrapped in a pastiche of that rhetorical gift. Or is it the product of the headline writers? The reader might just ask many questions and consider many avenues … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Queer Atheist comments on Andy Divine’s retrospective look at The Church & its relation to a possible Politics of Redemption?
In Andy’s essay of 1,599 words, the pronoun ‘I’ is used 44 times and ‘me’ 10 times. This essay is not just about Andy’s returning to Worship, after the Covid-19 Pandemic, but a retrospective on the failings of that Church … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment