Reader consider Tom Friedman & Bret Stevens as Zionist Twins!

stephenkmacksd.com/

Mar 02, 2026


Tom Friedman is the Political Twin of Bret Stephens!

To think clearly about Middle East wars, you need to hold multiple thoughts in your head at the same time. It’s a complicated, kaleidoscopic region where religion, oil, tribal politics and great power politics interweave in every major story. If you are looking for a black-and-white narrative, you might want to take up checkers. So, here are my four thoughts on Iran — at least for today.

First, I hope this effort to topple the clerical regime in Tehran succeeds. It is a regime that murders its people, destabilizes its neighbors and has destroyed a great civilization. There is no single event that would do more to put the whole Middle East on a more decent, inclusive trajectory than the replacement of Tehran’s Islamic regime with a leadership focused exclusively on enabling the people of Iran to realize their full potential with a real voice in their own future.

To think clearly about Middle East wars, you need to hold multiple thoughts in your head at the same time. It’s a complicated, kaleidoscopic region where religion, oil, tribal politics and great power politics interweave in every major story. If you are looking for a black-and-white narrative, you might want to take up checkers. So, here are my four thoughts on Iran — at least for today.

Second, this will not be easy, because this regime is deeply entrenched and is hardly going to be toppled from the air alone.

Third, we must remember that the timing of the end of this war will be determined as much by the oil markets and the financial markets as by the military state of play inside Iran.

Fourth, we must not let this war to bring democracy and the rule of law to Iran distract us from the threats to democracy and the rule of law posed by Trump in America and by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel.

Editor: Reader there are only 1795 words left in Tom Friedman’s political chatter at full gallop. Yet Friedmans final paragraphs, awash in well worn platitudes resembles Miss Havisham’s wedding cake, well past rot!

It is way too early to predict how this war will impact two critical 2026 elections — one in Israel and one in the United States.

For Trump it is simple. He does not want to see the word “quagmire” in any headline with his name in it ahead of the midterms in November. As for Netanyahu, I could imagine him calling for early elections to use the downfall of the Iranian regime to keep himself in power. But victory over Iran could also complicate his politics. Netanyahu has notched short-term military defeats over Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah and Iran, but he has not translated a single one of them into long-term diplomatic or political gains. To do so would require him to agree to negotiate again with the Palestinians based on a framework of two states for two peoples.

The opportunity for Israel could be enormous: If the Islamic Republic of Iran is either toppled or defanged, I have little doubt that Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Syria, Oman, Qatar, Kuwait and maybe even Iraq would feel much more comfortable normalizing relations with Israel — on the condition that Netanyahu does not annex Gaza or the West Bank, but agrees instead to a plan for separation and a two-state solution. Would Netanyahu rise to that opportunity? Would Israeli voters punish him if he doesn’t?

But I get ahead of myself. I expect by Wednesday there will be at least three more points competing in my head to make sense of it all, because this is the most plastic, unpredictable moment in the Middle East since the Iranian Revolution in 1979. Everything — and its opposite — is possible.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The reader of Bret Stephens latest war mongering confronts, the fact that Leo Strauss invented the History, on which he and his epigones reley.

Newspaper Reader excumes the remaines of the Strausian Political Mythology, via Stephens toxic political refraction.

stephenkmacksd.com/

Mar 01, 2026

Headline: Trump and Netanyahu Are Doing the Free World a Favor

Editor: Stephens applys both soothing and reviling tones to his critics

President Trump is being criticized from many quarters for his decision to join Israel in a war to topple the Iranian regime, which on Saturday yielded the killing of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The reasons vary.

It’s “a betrayal of the American people,” says Elizabeth Warren, who warns that the intervention risks dragging “yet another generation into a forever war.” It’s a betrayal of MAGA principles, says Marjorie Taylor Greene, who denounced Trump for putting “America last.” It’s unconstitutional, according to the American Civil Liberties Unionbecause it’s being conducted without authorization from Congress. It’s unnecessary, according to the writer Andrew Sullivan, who (quoting me, albeit misleadingly) thinks that Iran isn’t much of a threat and the war is being waged for Israel’s sake.

Editor: notice that Stephens becomes the victim of these toxic actors, its victimology is varian tones!

And so on. But one country where the United States and Israel are garnering broad support is the same country that’s being bombed.

Editor: What might a reader, listener, viewer make of the two reports not from Zionist Front Man Bret Stephens?

Dr Mohammad Marandi LIVE From Iran + Military Analyst Haim Bresheeth Zabner:


Iran’s Missiles SMASH US Bases, Trump-Israeli War BACKFIRES | Elijah Magnier & Mohammad Marandi


Editor: The next 696 words of Stephens self-serving political chatter, makes way for self-adutatory chatter, featuring himself as thinket, writer, expert, not to speak of his singular attachment to the Genocidal State of Israel!

The United States is stronger when anti-American dictators have solid reasons to fear our wrath: It restores deterrence and, in doing so, makes diplomacy more effective. Israel and the Arab world are safer when Iran is weaker: Notice that, at least so far, Hezbollah, fearing for its position in Lebanon, has not joined the war against Israel. Finally, even if the regime doesn’t fall, it will be under heavy internal pressure to modify its behavior as a pragmatic concession to reality, much as Venezuela has under Delcy Rodríguez, its (hopefully) interim president.

That may not be the optimal outcome. But it’s considerably better than what came before.

Finally, the United States and Israel have taken considerable military and political risks to do the right thing. And that’s no small thing.

They have rid the world of an odious tyrant, and of several layers of his equally odious deputies. It’s odd that the same people who fault Trump for divorcing U.S. foreign policy from its democratic values now fault him for going to war for the sake of advancing democratic values. Still, millions of ordinary people around the world — not just in Tel Aviv or Tehran or Tehrangeles but also, perhaps, in Taipei and Tallinn — will notice that the United States, for its many warts, still stands for freedom.

My column has never been shy about denouncing either Trump or Netanyahu. It won’t be shy to criticize them in the future. But on Saturday this much-maligned duo did the free world a courageous and historic favor. It will be remembered long after the petulant criticism dies down.

Newspaper Reader.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Editor: On the proposition that there can never be enough high-brow Niall Ferguson?

Old Socialist on Ferguson and South Park!

stephenkmacksd.com/

Mar 01, 2026

Editor: Mr. Fergusons latest fore into Pop Culture: compare and contrast with this collection of Fergusons commetaries that follow this The Free Press chatter! ‘South Park’ is the measure of an utterly re-imagined Ferguson? A collection of those highbrow commetaries will follow!


On the Inconvience Of History: the case of Niall Ferguson from May 08, 2013!

Posted on March 18, 2025 by stephenkmacksd

Newspaper Reader: A case of bad judgement or someting else? stephenkmacksd.com/ Mar 16, 2025 The historian Niall Ferguson has denied being an “gay-basher”, claiming that his friendship with the prominent homosexual blogger Andrew Sullivan showed that he could not be … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment | Edit


Niall Ferguson opines: ‘Biden Can’t Pay His Way Out of Fighting Cold War II’

Posted on May 22, 2024 by stephenkmacksd

Political Observer comments. The regular reader of Mr. Niall Ferguson’s cumbersome , bloated historical panoramas, the word count in this instance is 2596 -The Straussian method is to drown the reader in verbiage, ideas, actors, as a strategy to make … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment | Edit


Katy Balls interviews Niall Ferguson & Freddy Gray: They discuss the Trump Conundrum, on YouTube of May 11, 2023

Posted on June 16, 2023 by stephenkmacksd

Political Observer comments. This discussion begins at the 01:20 point and ends before the 21:18 point. Katy Balls asks questions of her two guests Ferguson and Grey act the parts of Political Technocrats, relying on ‘Polling Data’ as a reliable source- … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment | Edit


Niall Ferguson in three keys. Political Skeptic reads the irrepressible ‘expert’ !

Posted on May 11, 2021 by stephenkmacksd

In the May 7, 2021 edition of the the TLS, Charles King’s reviews Niall Ferguson’s new book ‘Doom: The politics of catastrophe’. Some revelatory excerpts: … At its best, Doom is a vade mecum to misery. Whatever readers are facing … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment | Edit


The American Election 2020, as refracted through the Financial Times Editorial Board, Edward Luce & an assist from Niall Ferguson . Political Observer comments

Posted on November 4, 2020 by stephenkmacksd

I woke up at 4:30 AM PST, this morning, and checked twitter for the latest Election News, not knowing what to expect, other than bad news. Now at the breakfast table, I’ve read first the Editorial Board of The Financial … Continue reading →


Neo-Con Niall Ferguson on the Crisis in California: Fires, One Party Rule, ‘Decadence/Decline’. Political Skeptic comments

Posted on September 22, 2020 by stephenkmacksd

The reader can only wonder at Mr. Ferguson’s – what reads like nostalgia for George Deukmejian and Pete Wilson, of Prop 87? Oh! sorry he is just a late arrival to California, 2016, in its advanced state of ‘Decadence/Decay’ the … Continue reading →


Niall Ferguson on The Pandemic & other pressing questions. Political Observer comments

Posted on June 22, 2020 by stephenkmacksd

I came here from The Financial Times. Just looking at Gideon Rachman’s latest essay, made me a bit queasy: Headline: India picks a side in the new cold war Sub-headline: It is folly for China to drive its rival into … Continue reading →


Niall Ferguson takes the measure of the collapsing American Neo-Liberal State. Political Observer comments

Posted on June 8, 2020 by stephenkmacksd

Perhaps this is one of the reasons that Mr. Ferguson left the august Times ? ‘He is the founder and managing director of Greenmantle LLC, a New York-based advisory firm.’ Mr. Ferguson is another peddler, with his vaunted ‘expertise’ like … Continue reading →


Niall Ferguson & Gideon Rachman on ‘Sleepy Joe’. Political Observer comments

Posted on March 9, 2020 by stephenkmacksd

In his column of Sunday March 8, 2020, Niall Ferguson: Headline: Sleepy Joe Biden has given Donald Trump a wake-up call Sub-headline: Despite his senior moments, the comeback codger has a real shot I know Joe Biden. Not well, but … Continue reading →


Niall Ferguson & Edward Luce on Michael Bloomberg. Old Socialist comments

Posted on February 24, 2020 by stephenkmacksd

Compare Mr. Luce’s ‘political wisdom’, or should it be properly named a collection of reportorial, rhetorical cliches, a product of lazy thinking, that could have been written in haste? to that of Niall Ferguson’s essay of Sunday 23, 2020: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/past-six-days/2020-02-23/comment/michael-bloomberg-leads-in-cash-but-trails-in-charisma-hvjd33zxm … Continue reading →

Old Socialist.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bret Stephens and The New York Times are the the advocate/apologists for Trump & Miriam Adelson’s War on Iran!

Newspaper Reader.

stephenkmacksd.com/

Mar 01, 2026

Editor: A selection from Bret Stephens toxic commentary:

It’s a bad theory. To listen to the regime’s rhetoric is to be reminded of the Black Knight of “Monty Python and the Holy Grail,” who loses limb after limb while insisting he’s still winning. The regime has lost much of its nuclear infrastructure; watched its regional proxies be overthrowndecimated and incapacitated; presided over the implosion of its economy; and lost whatever domestic and international legitimacy remained to it.

No wonder protests in Iran have resumed, this time among university students who are bravely undaunted by the terrifying risk. Their protests seem connected to the 40-day memorials for the victims of last month’s massacres. But it’s not a stretch to assume those protests are also a signal to Trump that his promise last month to Iranians that “help is on its way” hasn’t been forgotten, and that ordinary Iranians are prepared to join the fight for their own liberation.

If so, then there is at least a reasonable chance that a sustained military operation that not only further degrades the regime’s nuclear, missile and military capabilities — a desirable outcome in its own right — but also targets its apparatus of domestic repression could embolden the type of sustained mass protests that could finally bring the regime down. Even more so if the leaders who give the orders, including the supreme leader and his circle, are not immune from attack.

For all of its willfulness and the evil it has wreaked over 47 years, the regime does not stand 10 feet tall. It nearly fell during the 2009 Green Movement against that year’s fraudulent elections. It nearly fell again in 2022 during the Women, Life, Freedom protests.

The difference on those occasions was the absence of external military support. Donald Trump now has a unique opportunity to provide it. Despite the risk that military strikes entail, the bigger risk, in the judgment of history, would be to fail to take it.

Editor: Bret Stephens is a Zionist Loyalist, his time from 2002 to 2004, as editor-in-chief of The Jerusalem Post demostrates his political loyelties? Or can that be construed as an instance of ‘Anti-Semitism’ the fallback position of a political opportunist ? Yet with no experience of war, but an utter penchent for sending others to fight his chosen battles: The Neo-Consevative calling card is strewn with the blood of others!


The New Your Times of March 1, 2026, 6:00 a.m. ET:

A Tyrant Falls. Dangerous Uncertainty Begins.

Editor : The New York Times like it’s hireling Stephens relpay the Old Cold War platitudes that are replayed again and again: Vietnam, The Iraq War, The War in Afghanistan.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei governed Iran with the vigilance and brutality of an autocrat convinced that his own people and the world’s superpower sought to unseat him — and in the end, they did. With President Trump’s announcement that Ayatollah Khamenei, the 86-year-old supreme leader, was killed in joint American and Israeli airstrikes on Saturday, his reign has come to a close, cementing a lost half-century for his nation. As the Middle East confronts an unpredictable void, let us be clear: No one should mourn the death of a dictator who spent decades inflicting misery and bloodshed.

Ascending to power in 1989, Ayatollah Khamenei organized his existence around an obsession with the West. As a ruler, he squelched dissent, labeling demands for reforms as Western “sedition,” and expanded the intelligence apparatus of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps to repress his own people. He impoverished his citizens to bankroll foreign interventions and a nuclear program that brought Iran only isolation. When faced with citizens’ protests, he answered with force, including the slaughter of thousands earlier this year. Abroad, his legacy is one of destabilization, having constructed a so-called axis of resistance across Gaza, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen.

Editor: The first paragraps of the NYT Opinion The Editorial Board

Editor: The final paragraps of this ‘Editorial’ again repeats the perenial tropes of American Hegemony/Imperiaism!

The president still has not offered an explanation for why this campaign will end any better than the 21st-century regime change efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan did. Those wars also toppled governments. Yet their disappointing, bloody legacies left Americans understandably skeptical of open-ended military operations.

Amid the chaos this strike will cause in Iran, Americans should brace for the possibility of retaliation. True, Iran has failed to exact almost any meaningful damage on the United States in recent years, and its military has been degraded. But it maintains an arsenal of missiles capable of overwhelming defense systems, and this weekend it hit a U.S. Navy base in Bahrain, among other targets in the region. Iran may also be capable of launching cyberattacks and proxy strikes against American forces and allies.

The bigger risks may lie in the future. The president of the United States has just helped assassinate a foreign leader without the approval of Congress, the support of most allies or a plan for the future. History suggests that unilateral American involvement along these lines often has consequences that are not immediately apparent. When American officials helped orchestrate the 1953 coup, they surely did not imagine that they were planting the seeds for the Middle East’s most radical anti-American government.

Managing the future in Iran will require thoughtfulness, attention and international cooperation. We urge Mr. Trump to work with Congress, but at this point we have little expectation that he will. Given this reality, Congress should play a leadership role; lawmakers from both parties are right to demand briefings and force a debate on war powers to ensure the president is constrained and held accountable.

Finally, the United States cannot navigate the uncertainty alone. The Trump administration, which has frequently treated our allies with scorn, should bring international partners into the fold, too. Confronting a post-Khamenei Iran requires strategic clarity and a global coalition, not isolated decision-making.

For decades, the Iranian people have sacrificed greatly for the prospect of a more open society. After enduring years of autocracy and international isolation, they deserve the opportunity to chart a freer, more stable future.

Editor: The reader must wonder at the inabilitiy of the these self-presented ‘experts’ who across time have caused more human suffering : Vietnam, The Iraq War, The War in Afghanistan. Yet wisdom wedded to self-congatulation is the vocabulary of political bankruptcy!

Newspaper Reader.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Financial Times of 2/28/2026 reports on the beginning of WWIII?

Newspaper Reader.

stephenkmacksd.com/

Feb 28, 2026

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Trump, The New Democrats & Schumer the ‘Shomer’!

Angry Old Socialist!

stephenkmacksd.com/

Feb 28, 2026

Does Emma Lazarus’ voice mean anything if the Age of Trump? The New Democrats mendacity and self-concratulation led by Schumer the ‘Shomer’ !

My last name is Schumer, which derives from the Hebrew word Shomer, or “guardian.” Of course, my first responsibility is to America and to New York. But as the first Jewish Majority Leader of the United States Senate, and the highest-ranking Jewish elected official in America ever, I also feel very keenly my responsibility as a Shomer Yisroel — a guardian of the People of Israel.

Angry Old Socialist!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Federal judges warn of contempt: The Marshall Project

stephenkmacksd.com/

Feb 27, 2026

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hillary Clinton accuses Republicans of ‘fishing expedition’ in Epstein testimony. Clinton delivers withering rebuke and says hearing is an attempt to deflect attention from Trump’s actions.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/26/clintons-testify-epstein-files-house

stephenkmacksd.com/

Feb 26, 2026

Hillary Clinton accuses Republicans of ‘fishing expedition’ in Epstein testimony

Clinton delivers withering rebuke and says hearing is an attempt to deflect attention from Trump’s actions

Hillary Clinton delivered a withering rebuke to a congressional committee investigating her supposed links to Jeffrey Epstein on Thursday, accusing its Republican members of embarking on a “fishing expedition” intended to cover up and deflect attention from the actions of Donald Trump.

In a furious opening statement, the former secretary of state suggested the event was “partisan political theatre” and “an insult to the American people” while repeating her insistence that she had never met Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex trafficker who died in 2019.

“You have compelled me to testify, fully aware that I have no knowledge that would assist your investigation, in order to distract attention from President Trump’s actions and to cover them up despite legitimate calls for answers,” she said, according to remarks she shared during the closed-door testimony.

Clinton’s onslaught came on the first day of a session that will also include a deposition on Friday by her husband, Bill Clinton, the former US president. The hearing is being staged at an arts center near the couple’s home in Chappaqua in upstate New York.

The Clintons reluctantly agreed to appear in response to a subpoena from the committee’s Republican chair, James Comer, after being threatened with contempt of Congress charges.

In her opening statement, Clinton excoriated the proceedings as “designed to protect one political party and one public official, rather than to seek truth and justice for the victims and survivors”.

Referencing her own career campaigning against sex trafficking, she added: “If this committee is serious about learning the truth about Epstein’s trafficking crimes, it would not rely on press gaggles to get answers from our current president on his involvement; it would ask him directly under oath about the tens of thousands of times he shows up in the Epstein files.

“If the majority was serious, it would not waste time on fishing expeditions. There is too much that needs to be done. What is being held back? Who is being protected? And why the cover-up?”

The hearing was temporarily suspended at the request of Clinton’s legal team after a photo of her giving testimony was shared on social media. It was later reported that the picture, posted by the Maga influencer Benny Johnson, had been taken by Lauren Boebert, one of the committee’s Republican members. It is against the rules for witnesses or lawmakers to take pictures during closed-door congressional hearings. Democrats condemned the breach as “unacceptable”.

Clinton resumed her testimony to the House of Representatives’ oversight committee shortly afterwards.

Robert Garcia, the committee’s ranking Democrat, said that during the interruption, Clinton had called for the hearing to be opened to the media.

The Clintons have previously complained they are being singled out unfairly to distract public attention from Trump, who had a long friendship with Epstein before breaking with him. They wanted the testimony to be given in public, rather than released in later in video and accompanying transcripts, as is planned.

Speaking during an afternoon break in proceedings, Garcia said Hillary Clinton had answered every question and called for transcripts of her deposition to be released within 24 hours. “The American people have a right to know exactly what she said, what questions were asked of her and how she responded,” he said.

Bill Clinton is scheduled to give testimony under identical circumstances on Friday, as representatives investigate links with Epstein that he has acknowledged and which are confirmed in files released by the justice department under congressional mandate.

Committee members have travelled to Chappaqua for the proceedings after it was agreed that the Clintons would not have to testify on Capitol Hill. Written transcripts and video footage from the depositions are expected to be released in the coming days.

Addressing journalists outside the Chappaqua Performing Arts Center, where the Clinton hearings are being staged, Republicans and Democrats vied for control of the narrative surrounding the files.

Comer, the committee chair, accused the Clintons of trying to avoid a subpoena when other public figures – including Bill Barr and Alex Acosta, members of the first Trump administration – had responded willingly.

“The Clintons haven’t answered very many, if any, questions about their knowledge or involvement with Epstein and [Ghislaine] Maxwell,” Comer said. “Again, no one is accusing at this moment the Clintons of any wrongdoing. They’re going to have due process. But we have a lot of questions, and the purpose of the whole investigation is to try to understand many things about Epstein.”

Garcia told reporters that he supported Bill Clinton being asked to address the committee but said Democrats would now demand that Trump testify following disclosures that files relating to a woman alleging he had sexually assaulted her when she was a minor had been excluded from the documents released.

He said: “Let’s get President Trump in front of our committee to answer the questions that are being asked across this country, from survivors, from those have been brutally attacked and raped, sometimes as children.”

Hillary Clinton’s summons has prompted accusations that the depositions are a partisan exercise intended to deflect scrutiny of Trump’s long association with Epstein.

James Walkinshaw, a Virginia Democrat on the committee, said: “There is no indication – zero, zip, zilch, nada – that Secretary Clinton had any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes. My fear is we’re here today as part of a political exercise, part of a long running fever dream where Republicans want to lock up Secretary Clinton.”

Hillary Clinton has denied having met Epstein, although she has acknowledged meeting Maxwell several times.

Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime confidant of the Clintons and Guardian columnist, said: “The big tell in the partisan intent behind this event is that they have subpoenaed and threatened with criminal contempt Hillary Clinton, who has nothing to offer, who has never met Jeffrey Epstein or communicated with him.

“She knows absolutely nothing. So the fact that you would do that to her and bind her into this shows exactly what their motive is.”

Both Clintons have deep experience in facing Republican-led inquisitions and have often emerged in politically stronger positions.

Hillary Clinton testified for nine hours in 2015 to a House select committee investigating a deadly terrorist attack on a US diplomatic mission in Libya that killed the US ambassador and three other Americans while she was secretary of state. Her appearance was widely deemed to have neutralized Republican attacks and boosted her campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Blumenthal, who also testified under subpoena to the 2015 panel, predicted that she would emerge unscathed from the latest hearings.

“Hillary faced Trey Gowdy [a former Republican representative and the select committee chair] who, at the end of the day, looked ridiculous,” he said. “Trey Gowdy is an intellectual giant compared to James Comer.”

Bill Clinton provided two sworn testimonies in 1998 resulting from a Republican-driven independent counsel investigation.

One related to sexual harassment allegations brought by Paula Jones, a former Arkansas state employee. He also gave grand jury testimony over allegations that his testimony in the previous hearing about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, a White House intern, amounted to perjury and obstruction of justice.

Bill Clinton has denied any wrongdoing and has called for all files relating to Epstein to be released. About 3m documents are believed to be still in the justice department’s possession, in violation of the terms of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Clinton acknowledges flying four times on Epstein’s private plan, nicknamed “the Lolita Express”, and appears in several photographs in the files, including one showing him and Epstein in a hot tub with a woman whose identity is redacted.

He says he cuts ties with Epstein in 2006 as the financier’s sexual crimes became known.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/26/clintons-testify-epstein-files-house

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Newspaper Reader on Larry, Curley, and Moe !

Newspaper Reader can’t forget all those years in front of that black & white 21 inch screen !

stephenkmacksd.com/

Feb 26, 2026

Trump condemns Iran’s ‘sinister’ nuclear ambitions in State of the Union

President warns Islamic republic is rebuilding nuclear weapons programme amid huge US military build-up

Newspaper Reader.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Le Monde on Jack Lang, Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein etc. etc….

Newspaper Reader offer just a portion of this current political/moral melodrama, that has exposed the corruption across a ‘West’ in utter decay!

stephenkmacksd.com/

Feb 26, 2026

OpinionOpinion

Jeffrey EpsteinJeffrey Epstein

The Langs’ troubling friendship with Jeffrey Epstein

Former French culture minister Jack Lang and his daughter Caroline Lang appear thousands of times in the most recently released documents. All evidence suggests that she had a much closer relationship with the sex offender than she now admits.

By Raphaëlle Bacqué and Ivanne Trippenbach

Published yesterday at 6:00 pm (Paris), updated yesterday at 9:03 pm

17 min read.

On June 20, 1990, before dawn, Jack Lang arranged to meet his guests at Le Bourget airport, just north of Paris. President François Mitterrand’s minister of culture had big plans to export the annual national music celebration he had created to the Soviet Union. His round trip to Moscow involved celebrities (Eddy Mitchell, Charlélie Couture, Alain Delon), a filmmaker tasked with capturing the event, and around 15 journalists. Out on the tarmac, the delegation discovered their aircraft: a private Boeing 727, fully fitted out with a lounge, bedroom and bathroom. The plane had been lent by a “friend,” answered Monique Lang, the minister’s wife, when asked about the mysterious owner’s identity. That “friend,” French diplomats whispered to the stunned guests, was Robert Maxwell.

The British media mogul and Lang had already known each other for several years. In 1987, the Socialist culture minister and the businessman, a former Labour MP in the House of Commons in London, even formed an alliance. At the height of the battle over the privatization of TF1 television station, undeterred by any mixing of business and politics, it was with Lang’s support that Maxwell and Francis Bouygues, head of the world’s largest construction group, managed to convince Mitterrand to choose them to buy France’s first television channel.

Maxwell also became a valuable patron for Lang. On July 18, 1989, they were side by side at the inauguration of the Grande Arche de la Défense, the giant monument aligned with the Arc de Triomphe. It was one of those celebrations that characterized the Lang years, complete with champagne and saxophonists dressed as astronauts. The British businessman had saved his friend’s colossal project by contributing 150 million francs (€42 million today).

The businessman also demonstrated his generosity by contributing 500,000 francs to fund events and commemorations related to the bicentennial of the French Revolution, notably for the digitization of period documents, affording himself the pleasure of attending all the Parisian ceremonies. Maxwell was, in fact, so close to Lang, who was also the mayor of Blois, in central France, that he owned a printworks in that city. In October 1989, he attended the Estates General of European Culture there at Lang’s invitation. Without even visiting his own printworks.

At the time, one of the minister’s two daughters, Caroline Lang, was 28 years old. After appearing in the films L’Argent (Money, 1983) by Robert Bresson and Chronicle of a Death Foretold (1986) by Francesco Rosi, she studied to obtain a doctorate in public law. And, for her first foray into professional life, she was hired by none other than Maxwell Communications in London. As always with the Lang family, blurring the lines was the rule, with private interests and public service, family and ministry all intertwined. At Jack Lang’s own office, Monique, in everyone’s eyes, acted as the head of communications, welcoming all the important artists on behalf of her husband.

In Epstein’s “little black book” – his address book, which the FBI seized as early as 2009 while investigating his embezzlement and sexual abuse of minors in Florida – Caroline Lang’s name is already there: three phone numbers and a New York address, apartment 9C at 400 East 52nd Street, in the heart of Manhattan. Had the daughter of the former Socialist minister already been noticed, as early as the 2000s or even before, by this businessman determined to spin his web around the world? Very few French nationals appeared in this directory that contained some 1,700 names. When contacted by Le Monde, Caroline Lang declined to comment.

Wildly close-knit clan

Since January 30 and the publication of the Epstein files, the documents have cast a raw light on the connection binding the Lang family, particularly Caroline, to Epstein. Their extensive correspondence, which lasted seven years, from 2012 until the sex offender’s arrest in 2019, reveals an intimate and troubling relationship.

Records show that on March 24, 2012, the American hosted a dinner in Paris attended by Caroline Lang, along with filmmaker Woody Allen and his spouse, Soon-Yi Previn, and US Ambassador Charles Rivkin and his wife. Epstein, who had been convicted four years earlier of soliciting prostitution of a minor, took care to keep paparazzi at bay, even as he returned to Parisian high society and rebuilt his extraordinary network. The following day, Jack Lang’s daughter thanked him by email for inviting her to his table. On March 26, she visited his luxurious Paris apartment at 22 Avenue Foch in the 16th arrondissement. Welcomed by the butler, she spent some time with the American, discussing Japanese literature and Vladimir Nabokov, the writer whose most famous novel, Lolita (1955), is also the confession of a sexual predator about the relationship he had with a 12-year-old girl.

Newspaper Reader.


This apparent nonchalance of the Lang family, pampered by their American friend, never seemed to be shaken. But it did not reflect Epstein’s true situation. For several months, the FBI had been on his trail. On November 28, 2018, the Miami Herald published an in-depth investigation titled “How a future Trump Cabinet member gave a serial sex abuser the deal of a lifetime.” The “serial sex abuser” in question was Epstein. The Trump administration official mentioned by the Florida daily was Alexander Acosta, the very man who, 10 years earlier, had accepted a secret deal with the millionaire to reduce his sentence to 18 months in prison in exchange for his guilty plea to soliciting prostitution from a minor, at a time when the FBI had identified 33 victims. This time, the journalist behind the investigation found around 80 women claiming to have been sexually assaulted and raped by the businessman between 2001 and 2006, when they were between 13 and 16 years old.

Did Caroline Lang hear about this article published on the other side of the Atlantic? In any case, she knew that her friend was accused of “international sex trafficking” and of “sex orgies” with a very large number of young women, some of whom were minors at the time. On March 4, 2019, Epstein himself sent her the letter to the editor his own lawyers had just published in The New York Times, in response to the Miami Herald investigation and the inquiries now being conducted by the largest American daily newspaper. Caroline Lang replied to thank him.

Fifteen days later, however, she invited him, as usual, to a family lunch on Place des Vosges. “Perfect, as usual, I will be on time,” Epstein replied with delight. She also invited him to a contemporary interpretation of Swan Lake at the Théâtre National de Chaillot with her parents on March 30, 2019.

The next day, Epstein told her in an email that Jack Lang had a “proposal” for him. Through Caroline, a meeting was arranged between the two men at the café Ma Bourgogne, Place des Vosges, to discuss it. It is not known what idea Jack Lang had for his American friend. However, his daughter Caroline would be among the last French people to see Epstein, who was arrested by the FBI on July 6, 2019, as he returned from Paris aboard his private jet. On August 8, 48 hours before he was found dead in his prison cell, the convicted sex offender included her in his will, leaving her $5 million (€4.2 million).

Newspaper Reader.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment