Its Monday July 17, 2017 at before 7 AM PDT, here is a screen capture of an e-mail I received from The Financial Times:
All of these ‘News Stories’ published on July 16, 2017, in order of appearance:
Headline: Theresa May gains Conservative support to sack ministers
Sub-headline: Backbenchers urge prime minister to bring discipline to feuding cabinet
Headline: Philip Hammond accuses cabinet Brexiters of leaking against him
Sub-headline: Hardliners working to obstruct business-friendly Brexit strategy, says chancellor
Headline: Theresa May’s new Downing Street team emerges
Sub-headline: In the prime minister’s office, officials are clawing their way to the summer break
The Tory penchant for ‘Referendums’ has been catastrophic to the political careers of both Cameron and May, to state the obvious. The fate of Britain’s membership in the E.U. left in the hands of The Great Unwashed! Where was ‘Political Fixer’ Lynton Crosby? May now faces a rebellion within her Cabinet as reported in The Financial Times: with each of these ‘Referendums’ the position and power of Corbyn grew exponentially. This newspaper has been active in promoting the Neo-Liberal Agendas of both Tory and New Labour, but with the rise of Corbyn, within Labour, May is the only hope for the survival of that Neo-Liberalism. Yet Gideon Rachman offers more of the same, posed as a question worthy of consideration, as antidote to the Brexit, this of July 17, 2017.
Headline: The democratic case for stopping Brexit
Sub-headline: The question is whether the British public would support a second referendum
https://www.ft.com/content/b3630088-6ac6-11e7-b9c7-15af748b60d0
Would-be Journalist
StephenKMackSD's Blog 