Thank you for your insightful comment!
Your name explains much: ‘cui bono: a principle that probable responsibility for an act or event lies with one having something to gain’ . I don’t think Cynic is the most applicable descriptor for you. Yours is a political realism, without the necessary filter of bourgeois political respectability, that rules the hermetic world of pundits, in print and on television.
The problem with Ms. Clinton engaging in a political attack on Sen. Sanders is that it will have to carefully crafted, so that it appears as a politically rational critique of his ‘populism’, in contrast to her more moderate gradualism, while cultivating her credentials as ‘tougher than any man in the room’ i.e. her bellicosity in Foreign Policy: while maintaining her status as the champion of a more restrained, but still politically potent Neo-Liberalism. If she is elected, look for an about face on the TPP born of an agonizing reappraisal. Americans are fed a steady diet of political melodrama. Look no further than the pages of The Financial Times!
If you can, please support my blog.