Stephen Bush chatters while Rome is set afire by ‘Artificial Intelligence’, in the pages of The Financial Times!

Newspaper Reader is reminded those Science Fiction Movies he watched in the 1950’s, at the Movie Theatre just a block away from our house, after my brother and I mowed the lawn!

stephenkmacksd.com/

Apr 14, 2026



Opinion Artificial intelligence

Mythos and the cyber security risk facing all states

AI is like the atomic bomb — once you invent the means to build one, you live in a different world

https://www.ft.com/content/4334460f-b599-4578-8840-d1c7ecf01e08?_gl=1*158zt7a*_up*MQ..*_gs*MQ..&gbraid=0AAAAAC_ArBvogxhdZj_NxYV2-dWQH0eLb&gclid=Cj0KCQjwy_fOBhC6ARIsAHKFB7_Tcr88gTL0pqKQ4Ai9K8jVsO8f7BqFgTVv-r7C8P22YplPBTpnDcMaAozaEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds&syn-25a6b1a6=1

Editor: The Bush Diagnosis of the problem of AI:

The reason AI is such a disruptive invention is that it sharply reduces the cost of intelligence. It could unlock great increases in productivity, or induce mass unemployment or violent revolution — because if a skilled professional working with AI agents can now produce as much as 500 of their peers, social and economic models are in for quite a shock.

For example, Anthropic says its latest AI model, Claude Mythos, can find vulnerabilities in cyber defences at a speed beyond most human intelligence. But does Mythos live up to the hype? Maybe, maybe not, but even if it is overhyped, something like it is around the corner. AI is already really good at coding, and will only get better. It will also, therefore, get better at finding and exploiting vulnerabilities in cyber security.

The good news for anyone worried about AI taking their job is that Mythos also provides a demonstration of how the technology may create employment opportunities. As AI improves cyber security, and as deepfakes and generative AI do an ever better job of impersonating human beings online, in-person verification is going to have to bear more, not less, weight.

It’s a reminder that the development of AI is not necessarily good news for everyone else in tech — it may lead to a permanent reduction in the number of jobs in coding, and increasingly smart technology may render the internet less and less useful for everyday use, if it becomes the location of ever more sophisticated crime.

Editor: Mr. Bush hits his hysterical stride :

AI is like the atomic bomb: once you invent the technology to build one, you live in a different, and more dangerous, world than before. But it is potentially more dangerous because fission weapons didn’t possess the ability to improve the ability of a random passer-by to develop a thermonuclear weapon, but AI does reduce the gap between the professionally qualified and the “unskilled”. Even before the launch of Mythos, AI tools not only make it easier for cutting-edge companies or states to launch cyber attacks, they make it easier for otherwise unimpressive minor criminals and lone wolf terrorists to do so. Technology with the capacity to do severe damage to critical digital infrastructure will, sooner or later, become at least as easy to buy online as it is to use the dark web to purchase cannabis or cocaine.

Editor : The final paragraphs of Mr. Bush’s wan diagnostic intervention!

The future envisaged by the creators of so-called cyberpunk science fiction may come to fruition — a world in which computers that are smarter than humans go hand in hand with technological and physical infrastructure that has more in common with the 1980s than the 2020s.

For AI companies themselves, there is a new risk. AI is already unpopular enough due to fears about what it means for people’s jobs. On top of that, there are new worries about what the technology means for cyber security. The benefits are very real, but they are less tangible and obvious to most people than their job being at risk or having to shell out for cyber security. The political backlash when either a politician has to explain that the technology means more public spending, or when an AI-boosted cyber attack takes down critical infrastructure, may be greater still.

Newspaper Reader.

Unknown's avatar

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.