anne-sylvaine.chassany@ft.com on the ‘Grand Débat National’ . Old Socialist comments

Headline: Macron’s response to the ‘gilets jaunes’ taps a French thirst for debate

Sub-headline: A Montpellier window into grievances aired in the ‘Grand Débat National’

Poor Macron, he stumbles over his authoritarianism under the rubric of Jupertarian Politics, that is facing the test of popular discontent. The canny ‘reformer’ would have started with the ‘Grand Débat National’ and built upon it. Consider this the arrogance of an enarque , in sum, a Technocrat of Neo-Liberal Disasterism.

Ms. Chassany continues to produce apologetic propaganda, but this time she personalizes it, with the addition of her family members, that adds charm and an insight into what matters to her, in its way winning and humanizing! Also indicative of a class bias, but propaganda is just that, and no more.

From what political quarter comes this?

If anything, the debate has raised expectations of reform — again — with the political risk of generating further disenchantment if it does not translate into concrete measures.

The Great Unwashed is exacting its costs on France’s Neo-Liberal Golden Boy, whose political ambition seeks the World Stage of the Leadership of the European Union, as his political capital is a the point of 31% : almost a match to the 36.5% of spoiled and uncountable ballots,that brought Macron to ‘power’ .  Celebrated in the pages of this newspaper as a turning point in French politics, as the coming of Neo-Liberalism, not so carefully placed under the propaganda rubric of ‘reform’. Could this be the turning point that signals the end of French Socialism? The expression of a hope of the Financial Times coterie?

Tellingly, they differed on the wealth tax — calls for its reinstatement have been omnipresent in the protests

The repeal of the ‘Wealth Tax’ is a  demonstration of Macron’s status as Oligarch!

Old Socialist

https://www.ft.com/content/3e977470-457e-11e9-b168-96a37d002cd3

 


 

Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.

 

https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.