George Eaton scolds the Jeremy Corbyn’s supporters. Old Socialist comments

In sum, Mr. Eaton’s essay expresses his contempt for Corbyn and his followers, the favored target of the respectable bourgeois press. See the Financial Times in its continuing assault on the ‘Rebellion Against The Elites’ i.e. the evil of ‘Populism’, in its continuing propaganda war against Corbyn. The central concern, even call it the imperative, is to make a path to the Prime Minister’s office for Mr. Khan, and its means is the cultivation of political status quo in his search for ‘power’. His burning political ambition leads him! He is a Blairite to his core. Mr. Eaton offers a firm scolding to the forces of reform: Mr. Corbyn and his army of political troglodytes, street urchins. The reign of  Neo-Liberalism was/is catastrophic, in more than economic terms. And The New Statesman proves the corrupting power of Thatcherism, in its various political iterations. Not to speak of ‘Liberalism’ and its intellectual leader Isaiah Berlin: a professional sycophant to the powerful, who needed a compliant front man. He practiced the dark art of sub rosa character assassination, while maintaining the fiction of his political/moral uprightness. Mr. Eaton maintains that tradition, but is above board in its practice.
The conflict between the Blarites and the forces of ‘Reform’ will define the history of the Labour Party for the next decade and even beyond. Mr. Eaton helps Mr. Khan make his case for ‘power’, but a ‘power’ to what end? More failed/catastrophic Neo-Liberalism? Or the mirage of the ‘Moderates’ i.e. Thatcher Lite? One last thought: Mr. Khan offers a lecture on ‘power’ not a ‘lesson on power’ !

Old Socialist


About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.'
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.