Author Archives: stephenkmacksd

Unknown's avatar

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary

At The Financial Times: Robert Service on Putin, a comment by Political Reporter

When all else fails a bit of Anti-Putin propaganda is always welcome at The Financial Times! But the choice of Mr. Service to deliver this inflammatory polemic is neither surprising nor out of place, as The Financial Times is, to … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

At The Financial Times: Mr. Wolf on Jeremy Corbyn, a comment by Political Reporter

The ‘sea change’ is upon us, Mr. Corbyn and his reckless Left comrades, yet even the political rationalist, the elder statesmen of the FT, Mr. Wolf, speaks in the same hysterical rhetoric that dominates the political conversation, although strategically muted. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

At The Economist: Episode CLVII of Jeremy Corbyn Political Apostate, a comment by Political Reporter

From the image that precedes this essay, a crudely reproduced, by Alamy/Getty Images, of an old Soviet Social Realist painting of Lenin, adapted with the head of Mr. Corbyn and the Union Jack: the re-purposing old Soviet propaganda to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

At The Financial Times: Lord Patten reviews Kissinger: 1923-1968: The Idealist, by Niall Ferguson, a comment by Political Reporter

If you had any doubt as to the direction of Lord Patten’s review of Kissinger: 1923-1968: The Idealist, by Niall Ferguson might take, this sentence assuages any doubt the reader might have entertained: What these passages admittedly do is to … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

At The American Interest: NMG takes the political measure of Jeremy Corbyn, some considerations by Political Reporter

Surely one shouldn’t be surprised at the screeching anti-leftism of the Neo-Cons. Considering that Irving Kristol and his fellow travelers started out as leftists. For confirmation of this assertion see Murray Friedman’s ‘The Neoconservative Revolution, Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ruthless Freud: on the suicide of Tausk , a comment by Philosophical Apprentice

From footnote 81 in Freud’s Paranoid Quest, a quotation from K.R. Eissler’s  ‘Talent and Genius: The Fictitious  Case of Tausk contra Freud: Here is a rationalization that could be applied to Heidegger as well as Freud.  Followed by this shameful … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

At The Economist: Jeremy Corbyn, Political Nihilist? A comment by Almost Marx

Title this essay ‘The Political Otherness of Jeremy Corbyn’: the Old/New Party Line of the apologists for Neo-Liberalism/Austerity and it’s successor Corporatism: ‘ He is firmly against Europe’s planned Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership with the United States.’ The Oxbridgers … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

At The Financial Times: John Lloyd, Europe’s leftwingers still swim in cold waters, a comment by Political Observer

Mr. John Lloyd provides an interesting, almost compelling political travelogue, yet it is lopsided in that the specter that haunts ‘The West’ is that the once ascendant dogmas of Neo-Liberalism have, in sum, been shown that it was a political/civic … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

At The Economist: My reply to Humberto Capiro

Mr. Capiro, thank you for your comment. It is easy to agree with Mr. Oppenheimer, in his conclusion: ‘My opinion: If Maduro wants to prove to the world that this year’s legislative elections will not be a sham, he should … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

At The Financial Times: ‘Labour’s disastrous choice’, a comment by Political Reporter

Pay attention to this sentence as demonstrative of The Financial Times argument, if that is what this collection of low grade insults and retrograde Neo-Liberal apologetics can be called: ‘Yet the longer he stays, the more he will tarnish the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment