Does Jonathan Freedland as Public Moralist ring true?

Old Socialist wonders at political opportunism, in its various and toxic itertions?

stephenkmacksd.com/

Dec 07, 2025

Headline: The Trump administration sinks to a new low – opening fire on drowning men

Sub-headline: These deadly US boat strikes are the latest example of a president corrupting both the law and morality

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/dec/05/trump-administration-opening-fire-drowning-men

Editor: To say that Friedman’s political opportunism is wedded to an exercise in public shaming of Trump, and his appoitees deserves condemnation is an exercise in what? Is self-aggrandisement too strong a concept? From a man, a writer who defamed Corbyn, with a kind of gusto that Trumps minions excell at in another context? JD Vance is perhaps the example that comes to mind! Or should a writer concetrate on the misdeeds of the Historical Moment, rather than look at another revelatory Historical Moment, of the past as a kind of revelatory frame for the political present?

The Trump administration looks ever more like a criminal enterprise – and now it seems to have added war crimes to its repertoire. Though even that may be too generous a description.

On Thursday, word came that the US military had launched yet another deadly strike on a small boat moving through international waters. This time the attack killed four people, bringing to at least 87 the number of people the US has killed in a series of 22 such strikes on what it says are drug boats – vessels carrying illicit narcotics in the Caribbean or eastern Pacific.

This has been happening for months, but the issue has only just drawn political heat thanks to a Washington Post investigation of the first such attack on 2 September. The paper reported that US forces hit the targeted boat once, then hit it again – the second strike killing two survivors clinging to the wreckage. According to the Post, the defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, had issued a verbal command to “kill them all”.

Editor: With a mere 1173 words left in Freedland’s exercise in ‘High dudgeon’ left to explore, what might the reader contemplate as a possible future for the American Republic? Might that reader contemplate a senario via Fletcher Knebel & Charles W. Bailey II Seven Days in May?

Old Socialist

Unknown's avatar

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.