David Brooks ‘thinks’ that his readership has forgotten his tedious War Mongering: ‘The Collapse of the Dream Palaces’ ?

Political Observer comments on his latest Anti-Trump diatribe, as if his own Political Past has been carefully eroded of any stain!

stephenkmacksd.com/'s avatar

stephenkmacksd.com/

Apr 18, 2025

Editor: Mr. Brooks’ opening paragraps:

In the beginning there was agony. Under the empires of old, the strong did what they willed and the weak suffered what they must.

But over the centuries, people built the sinews of civilization: Constitutions to restrain power, international alliances to promote peace, legal systems to peacefully settle disputes, scientific institutions to cure disease, news outlets to advance public understanding, charitable organizations to ease suffering, businesses to build wealth and spread prosperity, and universities to preserve, transmit and advance the glories of our way of life. These institutions make our lives sweet, loving and creative, rather than nasty, brutish and short.

Editor: collecting ready-made cliche’s is Mr. Brooke strong suit ‘The Collapse’ being his entance into ‘New York Times World’. But The Reader confronts in this 1124 word essay is these political actors:

NATO, Perkins Coie, Harvard, Columbia, Big Ten,Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Erica Chenoweth and Maria J. Stephan, (Think of the civil rights movement at Selma.), “Upheaval,” Jared Diamond.

But note Mr. Brook’s self-descritpion in his final paragraph, that reeks of placing himself above and or beyond the frey, that somehow retains political credibility, in Brooks’ self-conception?

I’m really not a movement guy. I don’t naturally march in demonstrations or attend rallies that I’m not covering as a journalist. But this is what America needs right now. Trump is shackling the greatest institutions in American life. We have nothing to lose but our chains.

Political Observer.

Unknown's avatar

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.