Political Observer comments.
Dec 04, 2024
Editor: This from Chicago Magazine of Febuary 1, 2017 might just put Mr. Stephens enthiasm for Rahm Emanuel, into another, more accurate perspspective !
Headline: Rahm Emanuel: The Least Popular Mayor in Modern Chicago History
Sub-headline:The mayor’s job approval drops well below the Bilandic Line in the latest Tribune poll—and his approval rating among white voters is just four points ahead of Harold Washington’s in 1985. By Whet Moser February 1, 2016, 3:56 pm
By Whet Moser February 1, 2016, 3:56 pm
A decade ago, TV writer John Rodgers was trying to figure out how low George W. Bush’s approval ratings would go. A friend predicted 27 percent, because that was the percentage of the vote the hapless Alan Keyes received in his comically lopsided Senate race against Barack Obama. “Twenty-seven percent of the population of Illinois voted for him,” his friend said. “They put party identification, personal prejudice, whatever ahead of rational judgment.” (Bush would drop to 25 percent in the Gallup poll, making it a pretty impressive prediction.)
The Tribune just polled ‘s approval rating. What do you know: it is 27 percent.
It’s a big poll for a local politician, almost 1,000 respondents, and Emanuel gets killed on basically every question. The only thing resembling a bright spot is that “only” 41 percent of respondents think he should resign, versus 51 percent who don’t. But the racial breakdown is dramatic. Whites are 26 percent for resigning versus 69 percent against, while blacks and Hispanics have basically same split: 51 percent and 50 percent for resignation, respectively, versus 40 percent against. It’s a big blow for a politician who needed the black vote to win a surprisingly contested second term.
How bad is 27 percent? It’s real bad. According to my search of Tribune job approval polls, since the era of Daley dominance began no mayor has ever been this unpopular. In fact, it’s so bad that it’s six points below the previous worst.
Richard J. Daley
He served before the age of regular job-approval polling, but a Gallup poll taken 10 years after his death in 1986 gave him a 73 percent job-approval rating. Before his last election, Daley won a Trib poll in a four-way mayoral primary with 55 percent.
Michael Bilandic
Remember him? He was the machine politician whose handling of the 1979 blizzard—both logistically and politically—is a famous cautionary tale for urban leaders. Prior to it, he had a 48-percent approval rating, according to a WBBM poll; afterwards, he fell to 33 percent.
Jane Byrne
She won because of Bilandic’s collapse, but a year later had a mere 35 percent job-approval rating—and, according to the Tribune in 1980, her good/excellent numbers were actually lower than Bilandic’s.
Harold Washington
Racial tensions caused problems for Washington in City Council, but his top-line numbers were good: 54 percent approval versus 36 percent disapproval in 1985 (though the split was 33/58 for whites), and 67 percent approval in 1987. The Trib used the northwest and southwest sides as a proxy for white voter approval that year, and he notched 47 percent in the former and 32 percent in the latter.
Eugene Sawyer
Washington’s successor was unable to fill his shoes, but his numbers weren’t atrocious. In 1988 the Tribune polled residents on a number of questions about his performance; 55 percent thought he was not “strong, decisive, and independent”; 54 percent thought he was not an “effective leader”; and 45 percent said he wasn’t “good at getting things done.”
Richard M. Daley
For most of his tenure, Da Mare maintained high approval ratings: 80 percent in 1991, 79 percent in 1999. After the Hired Truck scandal, arguably the biggest of his time in office, it slipped to 53 percent in 2005. By late 2009, after the parking-meter deal turned into a disaster, even the great Daley slipped to a Byrne-level 35 percent.
As for Rahm? His highest job approval ratings are among whites, but they’re bad, too: 37 percent, a mere four points above Harold Washington’s approval rating among whites in 1985.
Editor: Mr Stephens assumes that his particular reader won’t bother to check readily avavalable sourses of information! He is a propgandist by avovation and temperament. In this particular instance Mr. Stephens dons the weak guise of a Political Reformer of the New Democratic Party, fogetting that the Neo-Conservatives and the New Democrats have made an allience in the 2024 election. That Bill & Hillary Clinton, Braack Obama are now desperate to begin a political reinvention, post the resounding victory of Trump.
Mr. Stephens wastes no time in presenting Rahm Emanuel as the answer, yet the first paragraph above makes plain the fact Stephens wastes no time pointing out that Progressive Left as a natural enemy of the Parties hierarchy and presents Rahm Emanuel the natural enemy of : ‘The progressive left despises his pragmatism and liberal centrism’. Stephen’s re-invents Emanuel?
There’s a buzz around Rahm Emanuel — the former Bill Clinton adviser, former Illinois congressman, former chief of staff to President Barack Obama, former mayor of Chicago — possibly becoming the next head of the Democratic National Committee. The progressive left despises his pragmatism and liberal centrism. He has a reputation for abrasiveness. And his current job, as ambassador to Japan, has traditionally served as a posting for high-level political has-beens like Walter Mondale and Howard Baker.
But he also has a gift for constructing winning coalitions with difficult, unexpected partners.
…
Editor: Mr. Stephens relies on the well worn bad actor of ‘the progressive left’ that always falls into line with the New Demcratic majorty!
Editor: Here is a New York Times essay on ‘The Brothers Emanuel’ of June 15, 1997 by By Elisabeth Bumiller
The best Rahm Emanuel story is not the one about the decomposing two-and-a-half-foot fish he sent to a pollster who displeased him. It is not about the time – the many times – that he hung up on political contributors in a Chicago mayor’s race, saying he was embarrassed to accept their $5,000 checks because they were $25,000 kind of guys. No, the definitive Rahm Emanuel story takes place in Little Rock, Ark., in the heady days after Bill Clinton was first elected President.
It was there that Emanuel, then Clinton’s chief fund-raiser, repaired with George Stephanopoulos, Mandy Grunwald and other aides to Doe’s, the campaign hangout. Revenge was heavy in the air as the group discussed the enemies – Democrats, Republicans, members of the press – who wronged them during the 1992 campaign. Clifford Jackson, the ex-friend of the President and peddler of the Clinton draft-dodging stories, was high on the list. So was William Donald Schaefer, then the Governor of Maryland and a Democrat who endorsed George Bush. Nathan Landow, the fund-raiser who backed the candidacy of Paul Tsongas, made it, too.
Suddenly Emanuel grabbed his steak knife and, as those who were there remember it, shouted out the name of another enemy, lifted the knife, then brought it down with full force into the table.
”Dead!” he screamed.
The group immediately joined in the cathartic release: ”Nat Landow! Dead! Cliff Jackson! Dead! Bill Schaefer! Dead!”
…
Editor: This from Foreign Policy
Rahm Emanuel and Israel It was inevitable that the world would eventually realize the unhappy fact that President-elect Barack Obama will not represent a complete break with the past 60 years of American diplomacy. By tapping Rahm Emanuel, a fierce partisan of Israel who volunteered as a mechanic in northern Israel during the first Gulf War, it is fair …
By David Kenner, Middle East editor at Foreign Policy from 2013-2018.
Editor: This from Jewish Journal
November 6, 2008
…
His father, a pediatrician still practicing near Chicago, immigrated to the United States from Israel and spoke Hebrew with his son, when Emanuel was a boy. Emanuel volunteered as a civilian volunteer in the Israel Defense Forces during the 1991 Gulf War, serving in one of Israel’s northern bases, rust-proofing brakes.
…
Mr Stephens avoids the mention that he and Emanual are not just Zionists but of the the most belicose iteration of that cardre. Mr. Stephens acts as a conduit for Emanual’s politics, which he characterises as: But he also has a gift for constructing winning coalitions with difficult, unexpected partners.
With Hillary Clinton’s hysterical attack on the Constitutional guarantee of Free Speech, and calling her students Foreign Agents: and Biden Pardoning his son- when will be the propitious moment arrive for Rahm Emanuel to take the lead role of The New Democratic Party ? Mr. Stephens is a propagandist and constructs a senario dubed ‘Flip the Script’, that reeks of the arcaine vocabulary of those mythically re-engeneered ‘Mad Men’?
Political Observer .
StephenKMackSD's Blog 