The ‘Liberal Fukuyama’, in The Financial Times.

Political Cynic offers some thoughts.

Not at all surprising that former Neo-Con, now ‘Liberal’  Fukuyama is plowing the same field that he furrowed in December 8, 2013, with a new cast of characters:

The Ties That Used To Bind

The Decay of American Political Institutions

Francis Fukuyama

We have a problem, but we can’t see it clearly because our focus too often discounts history. 

The days of swooning admiration for his Hegelian pastiche are long gone:

End of History by Francis Fukuyama: A Critique by Shahid H. Raja of Aug 13, 2023 supplies a detailed critique.

Vintage Neo-Conservative Fukuyama, reappears…

The Democrats have a lot of work to do to wake people up to the magnitude of the challenge the country faces. If that happens, there is a possibility that, rather than eking out another narrow victory, they will win decisively. If that happens, they can begin to think about reforms that will reverse the process of decay. Believers in a classically liberal America need to reduce the ability of political minorities to stymie majorities, and streamline our impossibly complex processes and procedures to make government more effective. But first, they need to win.

https://www.ft.com/content/2b204c19-4050-4316-852c-9b0dbfdf23a1

StephenKMackSD

Unknown's avatar

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.