The Financial Times ‘reports’ on the watershed of the killing of Qassem Soleimani. Political Observer comments

 

Headline: Middle East braced for backlash after killing of Qassem Soleimani

Sub-headline: Fears grow that death of Iranian general will suck region into broader conflict

https://www.ft.com/content/52a2fce4-2e0f-11ea-a126-99756bd8f45e

 

The Financial Times ‘reports’ on the Soleimani killing with the aid of quotes from :  London School of Economics Middle East expert Toby Dodge, an anonymous Gulf official, Anwar Gargash, UAE’s minister of state and Benjamin Netanyahu.

Call this understatement?:

“No one in the Trump administration will have had a clear idea of its consequences so risk mitigation is almost impossible. Retaliation, in the first instance, is likely to be focused on Iraq,” said Toby Dodge, a Middle East expert at the London School of Economics Anwar Gargash and

The guarded comment of one anonymous Gulf official :

“There’s a great sense of relief,” said a former Gulf official. “However, Gulf states will be reserved in their official reaction given the fact that although everyone wants Iran to be contained within its borders, no one wants to see escalation.”

The statement of Anwar Gargash, the UAE’s minister of state for foreign affairs:

“Rational engagement requires a calm and unemotional approach,” Anwar Gargash, the UAE’s minister of state for foreign affairs, said in a tweet on Friday. Saudi Arabia also called for restraint after Soleimani’s killing.

The statement of Benjamin Netanyahu:

Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister, told Israeli reporters in Greece that Israel completely supported US actions. His office said he was cutting his trip short and would return to Israel to “follow developments” after the killing.

This reads almost like an actual news story!

Political Observer

 

 

 

 

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.