My reply to Pompeo

Thank you for your comment. Aside from the self-congratulation that suffuses your reply, there isn’t anything like convincing argument in the face of the inconvenient evidence:

In Brazil, Major New Corruption Scandals Engulf the Faction that Impeached Dilma

https://theintercept.com/2016/11/25/in-brazil-major-new-corruption-scandals-engulf-the-faction-that-impeached-dilma/

———————————————————————————————————-

Major New Brazil Events Expose the Fraud of Dilma’s Impeachment — and Temer’s Corruption

https://theintercept.com/2016/06/30/major-new-brazil-events-expose-the-fraud-of-dilmas-impeachment-and-temers-corruption/


Brazil Is Engulfed by Ruling Class Corruption — and a Dangerous Subversion of Democracy

https://theintercept.com/2016/03/18/brazil-is-engulfed-by-ruling-class-corruption-and-a-dangerous-subversion-of-democracy/

———————————————————————————————————-

Brazil’s all-corrupt politics

https://mondediplo.com/2018/10/06brazil

———————————————————————————————————-

A Blow to Brazilian Democracy: The Illegitimate Removal of Dilma Rousseff from Power

http://cepr.net/publications/briefings/testimony/a-blow-to-brazilian-democracy-the-illegitimate-removal-of-dilma-rousseff-from-power

———————————————————————————————————-

Noam Chomsky – A “soft coup” in Brazil´s election will have global consequences – The Intercept – out 2018

http://dowbor.org/2018/10/noam-chomsky-a-soft-coup-in-brazils-election-will-have-global-consequences-the-intercept-out-2018.html/

———————————————————————————————————-

Your ‘experience’ of both Mexico and Brazil, of the strength of Brazil’s institutional safeguards against corruption, and your assertion of Mexico as a ‘failed state’ , as you present them, trumps the objective evidence? And Obrador as ‘Leftist Ideologue’ plays to an audience habituated to Anti-Left hysterics: the very bread and butter of  The Financial Times.

Regards,

StephenKMackSD

https://on.ft.com/2PpkwI4

 

 

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.