Almost Marx on Osama bin Laden and The Voices of Empire

Osama bin Laden has been killed, so let the tribalist chants of USA begin (one tribalism mirrors another) , as an expression of the political irrationalism that has brought three wars, Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. To what end? Our Imperial Wars simply came home to us in another form, replete with a shocking, savage brutality, on September 11,2001. A reality hard to face from a citizenry that considered themselves invincible,untouchable,exceptional !
Was there not a point at which the Grand Architects of American Foreign Policy even conjectured that the power that was wielded by America would ever be challenged, by powerless troglodytes financed by a rich Saudi, in the name of a re-imagined militant Islam, that followed the lead of The Muslim Brotherhood. The severe myopia of the great minds and the pretenders to a prescience, that did not exist, but was predicated in the propaganda freely espoused by  the acolytes, the intellectual parasites in the vulgar press, that somehow a day of reckoning would not come, even if it might be insignificant. What we get is the same old tired triumphalist chatter in and on all the the mainstream bourgeois ‘News’ outlets. But Bin Laden and his idea and his money have fueled the concept of resistance to the American Juggernaut, framed in Islamist terms, and has spawned a thousand children and resistance is rife worldwide. We are in a corner. We freely make a twofold war: we make war on our own political traditions of the Constitution and The Bill of Rights and we make wars on an ever increasing  number of fronts. How long can it continue?Is our treasury inexhaustible? Is a state of permanent war, on fronts domestic and foreign, the inevitability that Imperial America faces?

Almost Marx

Unknown's avatar

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.