Chrysostom’s minute by minute commentary on Obama’s Speech of April 13 2011

http://andrewsullivan.thedailybeast.com/2011/04/join-the-live-chatvisit-whitehousegov.html

Can anyone take this trivializing political chatter as somehow constitutive of serious political commentary. It is on its face utterly unworthy of  consideration as anything except as the title of his blog states, The Dish. For serious commentary see Paul Krugman, Matt Miller,Robert Scheer. Elizabeth Drew at the New York Review Of Books blog has a sage and through examination of the speech enlivened by her political experience, not fettered by the trivializing political sensibility manifested by Chrysostom. Also see the Esquire's political blog for a very impressive essay on Obama's speech.

http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2011/apr/15/obama-house-radicals-budget/#disqus_thread

http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/

Unknown's avatar

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.