After Finitude (2008) « Refracted input

Quentin Meillassoux, After Finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. Trans. Ray Brassier. London: Continuum, 2008

After Finitude

After Finitude by Quentin Meillassoux

This book written by a young French philosopher has been taken up with great enthusiasm by a small group of English language philosophers -notably Graham Harman, Iain Hamilton Grant and Ray Brassier members of the London-based “Speculative Realism” and Atlanta-based “Object-Oriented Ontology” movements. (See also Larval Subjects for an interesting discussion). Alain Badiou in his preface praises the book in glowing terms claiming that the author ‘has opened up a new path in the history of philosophy’. (p.vii) I wasn’t able to track down the French original on interlibrary loan, so I have read the book in English (a rather good translation by philosopher Ray Brassier I am happy to say). Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

LENIN’S TOMB: Stop the presses… for good.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Crisis of the American Intellectual

http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/12/08/the-crisis-of-the-american-intellectual/

If you read this long article By Walter Russell Mead you must read the devastating reply by Frank, listed as reply #8. It is masterful. Frank is on his game, and takes the space that he needs to really critique Mr. Mead point by point while maintaining his narrative pace. You must read this reply after the post by Mr. Mead. Superb!!!  

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Funding illegal Israeli settlements? Priceless. | Crikey

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

My hero Cy Twombly by Edmund de Waal | Books | The Guardian

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

On Nixon Tapes, Disparaging Remarks About Ethnic Groups

 

Here is the utterly abhorrent Richard Nixon, showing the prejudices of a certain generation of American males, and their obsessive stereotyping of all others who were not them. Nixon’s policies almost look ‘progressive’ compared to the Republican Party of the last ten years, but he was a man who embodied most fully the political irrationalism that was the central notion of the Southern Strategy. Nixon was a self-hating and self-destructive authoritarian personality, much like so many of the present day Republican Party leaders and followers.

But here is a quote that highlights the realpolitik of the revered and lionized Mr. Henry Kissinger,our Metternich , and Nixon’s closest ally : “The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy,” Mr. Kissinger said. “And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern.” Master and servant in a perfect harmony of what? We drown in the evolution of questions.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Keeping Secrets WikiSafe

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Homosexuality in China: Collateral damage | The Economist

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Civil Administration wants Palestinians to submit requests in Hebrew only – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Clive Crook,Charles Krauthammer and The American Political Melodrama

http://blogs.ft.com/crookblog/2010/12/charles-krauthammer-is-the-fraud/

Dear Mr. Crook,

Mr. Krauthammer has set the level of debate at the level of the schoolyard taunt and you have followed suit. ‘Stupid Democrats’ has the intellectual patina of Mr. Thomas Friedman’s ‘suck on this’. A  strategy  that generates a great deal of a suspect rhetorical heat, but little light, to lapse in to a well worn cliché, although completely applicable, in this instance. Mr. Krauthammer is a propagandist, without intellectual remorse or apology. And in his column, he is at his usual endeavor of promoting his own political agenda, which may not be readily ascertainable to anyone but himself and his confreres: although the usual degradation of Mr. Obama is the operative strategy, no matter the occasion. Mr. Krauthammer confects his own reality and asks us, his readers, to share in this hasty ad hoc creation. No matter how one may approach this re-imagining of this budget compromise, it is the brain-child of an old pol casting aspersions at the party that was victorious in 2008. Although his party will have a beachhead in the New Year, framing the debate is a never-ending set of opportunities; one must plant the seeds of doubt as a matter of ongoing strategy, no matter the dubious provenance. That, in sum, could be considered the central philosophical idea of this Neo-Conservative thinker.        

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment