Any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind: John Donne

Let us boldly re-imagine, in the spirit of Richard Rorty, this maxim of the great Donne as, any persons death diminishes me, for I am human and cannot ignore my stake in the world of my fellow creatures. How would this apply to the death of Mr. Richard Holbrooke the American diplomat? His death will be old news by next week, hardly a startling observation. So, the question is when do we have an honest forthright discussion of his record as public man and American advocate? Do we engage in the un-reflective hagiography dictated by our homage to custom? For an antidote to this politically respectable chatter, this trivializing chatter, I have provided a link to Professor Stephen Zunes’ enlightening article at the Huffington Post.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-zunes/richard-holbrooke-represe_b_796447.html  

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stare decisis et non quieta movere

Definition: Stare decisis et non quieta movere =  to stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed. (Thank you, Wikipedia!) One recalls with a certain bitter nostalgia the bravura performance of Mr. John Roberts before the Senate Committee defending the sanctity of stare decisis. He was, in fact, a more respectable version of Mr. Robert Bork, the maladroit ‘Originalist’ who failed to charm the very same committee, even though he used all his Neo-Confederate whiles. But, unsurprisingly, Mr. Roberts shares with Mr. Rehnquist a stated belief in ‘Federalism’, while both really held to and practiced a reversal of the liberal political agenda through judicial fiat. Should the decision in Citizens United surprise? Should one have expected more criticism from the respectable but utterly docile American Press? Or is this really ‘The United States of Amnesia’ ?  (Mort Sahl -Gore Vidal)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

‘I Work Against Ego’: The Art of Hedda Sterne by Sarah Boxer | NYRBlog | The New York Review of Books

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Charles Krauthammer

Definition: Charles Krauthammer = A Neo-Conservative writer and theorist,  who worships at his inner shrine to these three deities: Nihilism, Chaos and Strife. These are the gods of masculine privilege and power, without mitigation. Mr. Krauthammer is a physician who, in practice, finds the Hippocratic injunction against doing harm unnecessary baggage, in the quest to annul the liberal ascendancy and to enforce the American will to power, as part of our historical destiny.   

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Amazon.com: Neoconservatism: An Obituary for an Idea (9781594518317): C. Bradley Thompson, Yaron Brook: Books

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Washington Post’s New Religious Right Now Blogger | Religion Dispatches

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Death of Neoconservatism: Six Questions for C. Bradley Thompson—By Scott Horton (Harper’s Magazine)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Smithsonian’s New Culture War by David Cole | NYRBlog | The New York Review of Books

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

George F. Will

Definition: George F. Will = In the weedy field of The American Republic stands the singular effloresce that is Mr. Will. He presents himself as the channeled spirit of Edmund Burke, the great English parliamentarian. Burke was a man and a thinker with a largeness of spirit and humanity, a defender of hereditary power as demonstrative of an inherent benevolence. Although Mr. Will has never demonstrated the breadth and depth of the Burkian political/moral sensibility, he continues to strike politic poses garnished with the apt quotation from his intellectual master, without, in the least, demonstrating any coherent understanding of Burke, the man, the moralist, the politician, except as a handy rhetorical prop to enrich his political nay saying.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Neo-Conservative

Definition: Neo-Conservative = The realization of a Platonic political vision, The Republic, founded on an active and deceitful paternalism, wedded to an unalloyed authoritarianism: Violent and murderous, without apology, willing and able to defend its exceptionalism as political wisdom, prima facie.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment