Cogitating Peter and Contempt

Cogitating Peter (CP) is an academic that writes a regular column of political opinion. His major problems as a writer and thinker are two;  his belief, his faith in his own expertise and a palpable contempt for his readers. This is surely a combination that might doom his random jottings to become the object of scorn, by the readers that are the subject of his scorn, even contempt. One cannot even imagine the good grey Mr. Lippmann ever addressing his readers as anything but as fellow inquirers into the nature and goods of politics, as practiced in a definable historical moment. Although Mr. Lippmann was a singular thinker in the world of newspapermen, his only intellectual equal being Raymond Aron, he was a gentleman of stoic intellect not given to affronting his readers with unmerited intellectual abuse.    

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Israel passes laws that critics say are anti-Arab

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Netanyahu: Israel will continue to operate against terrorists in Gaza – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed Wednesday that the Israel Defense Forces would continue to use “firm determination and assaults” against terrorist elements in the Gaza Strip, adding that Israel would not tolerate attacks on its citizens or communities. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Rockets From Gaza Hit Deep Into Southern Israel

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mark Steel: It’s Blair I feel really sorry for – Mark Steel, Commentators – The Independent

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Richard McKeon

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Chicago Blog: Richard McKeon: Twentieth-Century Man

jacket image

By all accounts, philosopher Richard McKeon (1900-85) was a legend in the classroom. The list of students for whom McKeon shepherded an academic pursuit or two reads like a roster of the twentieth-century’s most noted cultural figures: Robert Coover, Paul Goodman, Susan Sontag, Richard Rorty, Paul Rabinow, and Wayne Booth, among them. But McKeon never quite knocked out the one bankable work that makes an intellectual’s name—instead, his contributions—to everything from human rights, medieval philosophy, and the history of science to dialectics, literary criticism, and rhetoric—remain as diverse as the pluralist philosophy he helped espouse.

**

Our own executive editor Doug Mitchell shares the following thoughts about McKeon’s contributions to twentieth-century thought:

The University of Chicago Press has been home to many publications by and about Richard McKeon, going back to editions of Cicero and Aristotle and up to an ongoing series of Selected Papers in three volumes, of which two are already published, with a third due in 2013. McKeon’s range as a philosopher was enormous (from metaphysics and philosophy of science to ethics and international politics to aesthetics, education, and the philosophic arts, with special emphasis on the arts of logic and rhetoric). His participation in curriculum-building at various universities (from Baroda to Puerto Rico to Swarthmore to Chicago), and in establishing UNESCO and the drafting the Universal Bill of Rights at the United Nations has marked him as a significant player in the junction of philosophy with the world of practical affairs.

jacket image

What may be most striking about his notably original philosophy is its reformulation of the history of ideas as a branch of philosophy and philosophy as an examination of plural traditions of philosophic discourse. This positions his philosophy of systematic pluralism as an entrée to invention and judgment in the extension of techniques of discourse and of avenues to inquiry, eschewing relativisms and deconstructivisms, on the one hand, but also deflecting the absolutism of naturalisms and positivisms on the other. McKeon’s philosophy is undergoing a revival of interest in areas as diverse as sociology, literary history, neuroscience, rhetorical studies, and comparative studies in civilization and world community.

For this reason, the Press is delighted to offer a link to a website devoted to McKeon, established in 2011, which features his autobiographical writings, a bibliography of his works, and samples of his audio lectures as well as his lecture notes.

**

jacket image

McKeon’s many publications include several published by the University of Chicago Press that are still in print today: Freedom and History and Other Essays: An Introduction to the Thought of Richard McKeon; On Knowing: The Natural Sciences; Introduction to Aristotle; Selected Writings of Richard McKeon, Volume Two; and The Edicts of Asoka (coedited with N. A. Nikam). For those seeking additional information about McKeon and his philosophy, George Kimball Plochmann’s Richard McKeon: A Study, the first book-length treatment of McKeon’s scholarship, is worth noting, as is Walter Watson’s The Architectonics of Meaning: Foundations of the New Pluralism.

The newly launched Richard McKeon website includes varied responses to McKeon’s philosophies and promises to be a very helpful place to begin for those unfamiliar with this pioneering American intellectual.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Peter Beinart,Libya,Bosnia and The Crisis of The American Policy Elite

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-03-21/libya-war-and-the-bosnia-hawks-on-the-obama-team-leading-the-charge/

 

Peter Beinart in his latest essay on the Daily Beast of March 21, 2011, ‘Behind the Libya War’ displays his usual contempt for ‘ordinary Americans’ who are, in his narrative, unable to read a map, or to read English. A startling assertion based on what data? Contempt for his audience, his readers is, perhaps, unbounded. He also asserts:

‘But foreign policymaking is generally an elite affair, and Bosnia was the crucible in which a whole generation of American and European elites forged their view of the world.’

 He cites the names Samantha Power and Bernard- Henri Levy, two dubious Public Intellectuals who assume a necessary background to his commentary, as does the Bosnian conflict. All are carefully knit into his seamless but unconvincing, self-serving narrative. His closing paragraph could constitute the whole of his thought, on the matter of a particular man with a particular set of neo-imperial prejudices:

‘In a way, that is the question that Bosnia hawks (a category in which I include myself) were always able to evade. Twice in the Balkans, Milosevic caved just in time. We should all pray that Gaddafi does the same. Because if he does not, humanitarian hawks will be forced to face a painful truth: Americans will tolerate a lot of casualties in a humanitarian war, just so long as none of them are ours.’

Prayer is irrelevant to the issue of the behavior of Mr. Gaddafi. That is an assertion based on his unseemly haste: his random jottings do not constitute a serious, coherent political essay. One could sum up the American policy quandary as this: America has spent its moral and military capital on a series of wars of neo-imperial adventurism and has exhausted the world’s good will and forbearance, and in the process vulgarized, indeed, betrayed it self-concept.

This essay of Mr. Beinart convinces of two things: His contempt for his readers i.e. ‘ordinary Americans’, as an expression of his elitist self conception: and his need to fashion Bosnia as the moral/political nodal point of policy, ex post facto. I am convinced of one thing, as a long time reader of his essays, the trivial, improvisational character of Mr. Beinart’s ‘political thought’.  

 

 

  

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Amnesty et al. v. Blair | American Civil Liberties Union

Media_httpwwwacluorgf_fijeh

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

MOBYLIVES » “Our first duty is to establish a new and abusive school of criticism …”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment