Books of Interest: Can’t Stop Won’t Stop by Jeff Chang

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Books of Interest: White Riot: Punk Rock and the Politics of Race Edited by Stephen Duncombe, and Maxwell Tremblay Foreword by James Spooner

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Books of Interest: Of Men and Manners, Essays Historical and Philosophical by Anthony Quinton

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Books of Interest: The Opacity of mind, An Integrative Theory of Self- Knowledge by Peter Carruthers

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Books of Interest: Rationality and Religious Commitment by Robert Audi

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Books of Interest: Know How by Jason Stanley

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Book of Interest:The Copernican Question,Prognostication,skepticism,and celestial order by Robert S.Westman.

The_copernican_question

Please see the TLS review by David Wootton in the October 21st 2011 edition, titled Traffic of the mind.

http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520254817

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Books of Interest: The Birth of the Modern World 1780-1914 by C.A. Bayly

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Paul H. Rosenberg: The Last Freudian? by Political Observer

I attempted to comment on Paul H. Rosenberg’s latest essay, titled Fighting The Politics of Illusion, at AlJazeera this morning. The tweet of my comment was visible but my comment was absent. Was I ,perhaps, too pointed in my reply? My essay began with the question: Is Paul H. Rosenberg the last Freudian? Does he live in a time warp, in which the scholarship of Frank Sulloway, E.M.Thorton and Frederick Crews have yet to be historically manifest? Is Anna Freud, the author of The Ego and The Mechanism of Defense, on which he bases his essay, suffering from the effects of her ‘unresolved Oedipal strivings’ as intellectual heir and explicator of Freudian Science? Is Mr. Rosenberg intellectual curiosity and scholership mired in the year 1960? I am recalling what I wrote, rather than quoting directly. Mr. Rosenberg attempts to psychologize the the roles of political/ economic actors of the Economic Crisis of 2008 and the apologists for the aftermath. He offers no usable insights into the practice of wholesale thievery and the intellectual rationalizers of Free Market Economics: while one could hazard a guess at the idea and practice of greed, as a motivation for such conduct. That is following the Law of Parsimony, that the simplist explantion for any observed phenomenon is the best. Is Mr. Rosenberg’s use of the work of a prominent Freudian theorist, simply a manifestation of needing an intellectual prop and garnish to add a kind of luster to some not very original thinking?

Political Observer   

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Books of Interest: With Liberty and Justice for Some by Glenn Greenwald

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment