StephenKMackSD's Blog

While doing some research on the internet I came across this 2009 essay at The Daily Beast by Mr. Richard Haass titled Why I Didn’t Resign.  Here is the telling part of his argument:

‘People often ask me why I didn’t resign over Iraq. They also ask why Powell didn’t. One situation when resignation is warranted is if a person fundamentally disagrees with a major issue. Although Iraq constituted a major issue, and although I disagreed with U.S. policy, my disagreement was not fundamental. I was 60/40 against going to war. No organization could function if people left every time they lost out on a 60/40 decision. Had I known then what I know now, that Iraq no longer possessed weapons of mass destruction, then it would have become a 90/10 decision against the war, and in that circumstance I would have left had the president gone ahead all the same.’ Continue reading →

Does this sound familiar: ‘The Solitary Leaker‘, The Social Misfit,’the atomization of society, the loosening of social bonds’? The shotgun wedding of Psychoanalysis and Pop Sociology finds a home in the mind, the ‘thought’ of David Brooks? Continue reading →

Despite the celebratory mood of Mr. Douthat’s premature obituary on Europe, in his essay of June 1, 2013 and it’s weak argument: the ‘welfare state’ as the motor of it’s decline. Decline, the idea fixe of Conservatism across time and place, we might just bring the political conversation down to the terrestrial plain. Not withstanding the quote from Francis Fukuyama on the Hegelian delusion of the ‘End of History’, as interpreted by a student of the Strauss/Ravelstein school of philosophical pretension: thinking of this skein of argument as so many polemical hot air balloons. Continue reading →

I find the public career of Mr. Andrew Sullivan puzzling, disappointing even infuriating. I started reading him when he was writing for The New York Observer and subsequently as he and Christopher Hitchens kept the debate of 9/11 within the bounds that they thought as reasonable, intellectually and politically acceptable, two stern enforcers of their continually evolving master ideas. Continue reading →

The American Empire is and will be at perpetual war. That is the fate of empires, but the fate of the Republic is a matter of our gravest concern. How do the tangible facts of empire and it’s necessary strategies and practices affect, confront and nullify republican values,practices and institutions? President Obama seems to think that he can,will and is fully capable of mastering that conundrum. There was nothing anguished about the President or his speech, just the relaxed,confident demeanor of the most gifted American rhetorician of the age. The serenity of the just? One might even liken this problem to that of the Gordian Knot and cast the president as the radiant Alexander,too much,perhaps?The President’s enemies can and do argue this as a product of his aloofness and arrogance. Continue reading →