Author Archives: stephenkmacksd

Unknown's avatar

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary

Message to my readers.

Thank you for reading my blog. I know some of you have followed me, from my many years of commenting on The Financial Times writers. Many thanks, StephenKMackSD

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Colonial Rag @TheEconomist on the ‘Niger Crisis’

Political Reader comments. Contemplate the ‘failure’ of Putin’s 45 delegation’s.. the question of the decline of the of attendance to delegations, demonstrates that mollifying the American Hegemon is the wise course for African Nations? Headline: Putin hosts African leaders in … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

@TheEconomist on ‘Authoritarians are on the march’

Philosophical Apprentice comments. The Reader needn’t resort to the doom saying political hysterics of Niall Ferguson, to find that ‘we’ are in trouble, of the most dire kind! That Reader just needs to consult this ‘essay’ for a package of bad news. The Economist … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Neo-Conservative Ghoul Bret Stephens turns his attention to ‘Oregon’s Drug Addiction Treatment and Recovery Act, better known as Measure 110’…

Old Socialist’s brief commentary. Mr. Stephens can reach a state of high dungeon, in just moments, and maintain it’s screeching intensity, over the course of 868 words, in his latest moralizing diatribe. With telling changes of scene for Oregon to Portugal: … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

@RColvile confronts Sadiq Khan, on ‘The Ulez lesson’.

Old Socialist comments. As a preface to my comment: The Reader, as always, confronts the Stalinist Erasure of 2016: after the resignation of David Cameron precipitated by the Brexit vote, the rise of Mrs. May, the defamation of Jeremy Corbyn … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The embalmed remains of Bagehot, Adrian Wooldridge, proclaims Rishi Sunak a ‘Right-Winger’…

Political Observer comments. Mr. Wooldridge’s essay about Sunak is awash in political cynicism? its a convenient posture, that almost mimics critical thinking, under a heavy veneer of the ersatz. Note that Wooldridge ‘shows’ Sunak in his various guises in the first three … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

American provincial @michelleinbklyn opines on ‘The Disaster of Brexit’.

The Political Toxin of Jean Monnet’s Coal and Steel Cartel. @michelleinbklyn is the very bottom tier of The New York Times Public Intellectuals. The E.U. has been subject to, not just harsh criticism, across the political spectrum, but it’s utter … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Neo-Con Bret Stephens visits Ukraine, and writes glowing propaganda, of the New York Times variety

Political Observer comments. Mr. Stephens doesn’t quite reach the level of apologetics that fellow Neo-Con Francis Fukuyama expresses: Headline: Author Francis Fukuyama, a Stanford fellow, backs far-right Azov group after school visit https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/fukuyama-senior-fellow-stanford-far-right-group-18193614.php Francis Fukuyama, a well-known author and researcher … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

On The New York Times Public Intellectual Frank Bruni: ‘Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Is Where Paranoia Meets Legacy Admissions’

Political Observer comments. The Reader experiences a kind of political vertigo, while reading this meandering ‘essay’. Even Tom Friedman and David Brooks manage to express coherence of very particular kinds, in their political/moral/commentaries. Frank Bruni’s political observation, are tinctured in Pop … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A selective criticism of Niall Ferguson’s Manifesto: ‘The strategy of aligning democracies against autocracies could have an American Achilles’ heel.’

Philosophical Apprentice comments. Mr Ferguson no longer writes a column of opinion, but now resorts to that Straussian Methodology of writing a 2,626 word manifesto. That apes the Starussian ‘History of Philosophy’ as re-written in light of ideological imperatives ? … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment