Author Archives: stephenkmacksd

Unknown's avatar

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary

On the burning question of : The burr under @GoldsteinBrooke saddle: Fatima Mousa Mohammed’s Free Speech Rights! And her right to defend Palestinian Moral/Political existence!

Old Socialist comments. Headline: She Attacked Israel and The N.Y.P. D. It Made Her Law School a Target Sub-headline: A student gave a commencement address at the famously progressive CUNY law school. Two weeks later, she was attacked by the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Neo-Con Bret Stephens, @GrahamTAllison, “Thucydides’ trap”, ‘How Do We Manage China’s Decline?’ & …

Political Cynic breathes deep, and chokes, on the incense burnt in the names of misbegotten expertise. Mr. Bret Stephens is a political opportunist, always looking to guild his commentaries with some high sounding, and not the least pretentious opening paragraph. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

As a Reader I’ve grown tired of political commentators whose Anti-Historicism demonstrates a cultivated ignorance! The case of Tom Friedman & David Brooks

Political Observer recalls the Republican Convention of 1964, and the importance of Newspapers. I watched the 1964 Republican Convection, as a high-school drop-out, I watched too much television. The expulsion of William Scranton, or at the least the public shaming … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Thatcherite on ‘back to basics’: @RColvile’s Neo-Liberalism on the vexing question of ‘Government Spending’: via a frivolous ‘Culture Department’?

Old Socialist eventually finds, the elusive, diminutive, ‘Culture Department’. The Reader might just ask what is a ‘Culture Department’? Here are the opening paragraphs of Colvile’s essay, that does not mention that ‘Culture Department’ : Here’s a riddle for you. Energy costs … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Economist and Le Monde comment on ‘The German Malaise’.

Old Socialist offers a selection. Leaders | Economic malaise Is Germany once again the sick man of Europe? Its ills are different from 1999. But another stiff dose of reform is still needed Nearly twenty-five years ago this newspaper called Germany … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Andrew Preston’s reviews two books, in the August 18/25, 2023 edition of the TLS: On an attempted rehabilitation of the Psychohistorian and Psychohistory!

Political Observer comments on Preston’s self-willed ignorance. The Players: Andrew Preston, William Bullitt, Sigmund Freud, Woodrow Wilson, Patrick Weil, Zachary Jonathan Jacobson, Richard Nixon. Andrew Preston’s review begins here: Should The Reader look askance at the title of Patrick Weil’s … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Economists rhetorically exhumes ‘Germany the sick man of the euro’: Capitalists and Neo-Liberals ejaculate in unison!

Old Socialist comments. The opening paragraph of this exhumation is not surprising: Nearly twenty-five years ago this newspaper called Germany the sick man of the euro. The combination of reunification, a sclerotic job market and slowing export demand all plagued … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

On David Brooks as Fraudulent American Political Moralist.

Philosophical Apprentice comments. Having read all but nearly 600 words of Mr. Brooks’ essay ‘Hey, America, Grow Up! of Aug. 10, 2023. The Avatars of David Brooks latest scolding, are the misbegotten trio of Philip Rieff, Christopher Lasch and Tom Wolfe. Philosophical … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Avatars of David Brooks latest scolding, are the misbegotten trio of Philip Rieff, Christopher Lasch and Tom Wolfe.

Philosophical Apprentice comments. The framing of this latest David Brooks essay, in which he ponders ‘the decline of the American psyche’ what ever that might be? What are the credentials that Brooks offers The Reader? His long apprenticeship to Wm. F. Buckley … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Would be @NYT Torquemada, Bret Stephens, considerers the case of Paul Ryan.

Philosophical Apprentice comments. The first paragraphs of Stephens diatribe against Paul Ryan offers: Should The Reader be at all surprised that Politics, as practiced, is about the ability to adapt to an ever-changing landscape… call it hypocrisy if you must, … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment