Thinking the Impossible, French Philosophy Since 1960 by Gary Gutting: Some thoughts

I was very excited,and looking forward to reading Professor Gutting’s book, when I first saw it on the Oxford University Press website, and then ordered it, on its day of publication. I have not been disappointed, in fact it is one of the best books I’ve read on this subject. Let me list them for establishing a definable credibility for my thoughts.

French Philosophy of the Sixties: An Essay on Antihumanism by  Ferry and Renaut
Prophets of Extremity: Nietzsche, Heidegger,Foucault, Derrida by Allen Megill
Introduction to Phenomenology by Dermot Moran
The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction by Herbert Spiegelberg

As a reader I can’t think of higher praise for a book than that it made clear, what had been obscure or unintelligible, until the moment of my readerly engagement. Professor Gutting does not, at any point, engage in pointless forms of hagiography, as regards any of the thinkers that he writes about, in this indipensible history of philosophy. There is wit and salt here to enliven the inquiry and a healthy dose skepticism, in service to making clear some of the most obscure philosophers,thinkers, writers ever to put pen to paper;he even suggests a methodology for reading any obscure writer, that emphatically strikes a chord with a beleaguered reader. In short, invest your time and money wisely, in reading Professor Gutting’s book first followed by Ferry and Renaut’s and then Professor Megill’s. If you are really interested in Phenomenology be sure to read Professor Moran’s lively and witty Introduction, whose virtue is also an enlivening skepticism, about many, but not all, of the thinkers covered by Professor Gutting’s book. Professor Spiegelberg’s history is also worthy of the time of any serious inquirer.

Best regards,
StephenKMackSD

Unknown's avatar

About stephenkmacksd

Rootless cosmopolitan,down at heels intellectual;would be writer. 'Polemic is a discourse of conflict, whose effect depends on a delicate balance between the requirements of truth and the enticements of anger, the duty to argue and the zest to inflame. Its rhetoric allows, even enforces, a certain figurative licence. Like epitaphs in Johnson’s adage, it is not under oath.' https://www.lrb.co.uk/v15/n20/perry-anderson/diary
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.